art is not only for pleasure. This is also a tool to offend and criticize.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2013/08/fine-art-can-be-funny-and-offensive-victor-navasky-on-political-cartoons.html

art is not only for pleasure. This is also a tool to offend and criticize.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/2013/08/fine-art-can-be-funny-and-offensive-victor-navasky-on-political-cartoons.html

Art is all about proportion. Cartoon is just the reverse. Disproportionate images are called cartoons. For example- very long nose, long teeth, small eyes- will evoke laughter or offence. Thus cartoon may be considered anti art.

Art is all about proportion. Cartoon is just the reverse. Disproportionate images are called cartoons. For example- very long nose, long teeth, small eyes- will evoke laughter or offence. Thus cartoon may be considered anti art.

Art is all about proportion. Cartoon is just the reverse. Disproportionate images are called cartoons. For example- very long nose, long teeth, small eyes- will evoke laughter or offence. Thus cartoon may be considered anti art.

I beg to differ with you. cartoonist has a social responsibility to highlight the injustice in the society. Cartoonism is both an art and science. History is replete with examples of how a cartoon changed the course of history. It's only cartoonists with mediocre standards indulge in mean way of digging the people. Our own Indian cartoonist Shankar has become a favourite of all the commoners as well as veteran politicians like Ram manohar lohia, Nehru to name a few.

Art is all about proportion. Cartoon is just the reverse. Disproportionate images are called cartoons. For example- very long nose, long teeth, small eyes- will evoke laughter or offence. Thus cartoon may be considered anti art.

I beg to differ with you. cartoonist has a social responsibility to highlight the injustice in the society. Cartoonism is both an art and science. History is replete with examples of how a cartoon changed the course of history. It's only cartoonists with mediocre standards indulge in mean way of digging the people. Our own Indian cartoonist Shankar has become a favourite of all the commoners as well as veteran politicians like Ram manohar lohia, Nehru to name a few.

Art is all about proportion. Cartoon is just the reverse. Disproportionate images are called cartoons. For example- very long nose, long teeth, small eyes- will evoke laughter or offence. Thus cartoon may be considered anti art.

I beg to differ with you. cartoonist has a social responsibility to highlight the injustice in the society. Cartoonism is both an art and science. History is replete with examples of how a cartoon changed the course of history. It's only cartoonists with mediocre standards indulge in mean way of digging the people. Our own Indian cartoonist Shankar has become a favourite of all the commoners as well as veteran politicians like Ram manohar lohia, Nehru to name a few.

Bal Thakrey, Sudhir Telang, RK Laxman are some of the very famous ones who changed some of the ways of happenings in India.

Art is all about proportion. Cartoon is just the reverse. Disproportionate images are called cartoons. For example- very long nose, long teeth, small eyes- will evoke laughter or offence. Thus cartoon may be considered anti art.

I beg to differ with you. cartoonist has a social responsibility to highlight the injustice in the society. Cartoonism is both an art and science. History is replete with examples of how a cartoon changed the course of history. It's only cartoonists with mediocre standards indulge in mean way of digging the people. Our own Indian cartoonist Shankar has become a favourite of all the commoners as well as veteran politicians like Ram manohar lohia, Nehru to name a few.

I don't say that cartoon is not an art and science or any way not significant for social causes. I only mentioned he nature of cartoon. How you make cartoon. This you do by disproportion. For example, you will make very long legs and small chest, a very long nose or distort in some other way. The other art form display images in proportion as against cartoon which depends on disproportion.

Art is all about proportion. Cartoon is just the reverse. Disproportionate images are called cartoons. For example- very long nose, long teeth, small eyes- will evoke laughter or offence. Thus cartoon may be considered anti art.

I beg to differ with you. cartoonist has a social responsibility to highlight the injustice in the society. Cartoonism is both an art and science. History is replete with examples of how a cartoon changed the course of history. It's only cartoonists with mediocre standards indulge in mean way of digging the people. Our own Indian cartoonist Shankar has become a favourite of all the commoners as well as veteran politicians like Ram manohar lohia, Nehru to name a few.

I don't say that cartoon is not an art and science or any way not significant for social causes. I only mentioned he nature of cartoon. How you make cartoon. This you do by disproportion. For example, you will make very long legs and small chest, a very long nose or distort in some other way. The other art form display images in proportion as against cartoon which depends on disproportion.