You are right friend...... Netaji the real hero of India without selfishness. He is the epitome of discipline . Let the so called
social workers and RTI activists first seek information about themselves under the RTI act befoire contemplating to seek RTI about scar-less leaders like NETAJI

People are not trying to ask any questions which will sabotage his image but they are only trying to know about his mysterious death. That would no way harm Netaji, the real hero's reputation. This is a long pending demand from many people and organizations who loved and respected netaji who has no parallel of himself.

The question and answer relating to Netaji are very old and repeated time to time. Nothing new can come out. So, such questions under RTI make no sense.

True, the questions on Netaji are very old and relevant ones but we have yet to see the answers coming from government. If they had answered, whatever the truth, there was no need to ask them repeatedly and government was not required to waste its time saying "NO" every time.

One way or the other , i don't think they can answer it now.. They way they are loosing files, how can we expect them to have records so old...

Let me make it clear, this is not case of lost files but unwillingness of our government to provide information on certain grounds. The matter may bring controversies with a friend nation most people believe he was alive well into 80s. see these links

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance_of_Subhas_Chandra_Bose

http://netajibosemysteryrevealed.org/my-deposition-before-mukherjee-commission/

That's really kool.. So many things are to be known and such a small life for all the mystries...

Seeking information is not a crime. The very purpose of RTI is to serve the information seekers on sound grounds. I learned from some of the members in this discussion that a person wanted to seek the information about all the unmarried teachers of a particular state to find an alliance to his daughter. This is certainly abusing the provision of RTI. Such seekers should be refused. And it is the duty of the information seeker to explain in no uncertain terms to the authorities the purpose for which he is seeking the information.

Seeking information is not a crime. The very purpose of RTI is to serve the information seekers on sound grounds. I learned from some of the members in this discussion that a person wanted to seek the information about all the unmarried teachers of a particular state to find an alliance to his daughter. This is certainly abusing the provision of RTI. Such seekers should be refused. And it is the duty of the information seeker to explain in no uncertain terms to the authorities the purpose for which he is seeking the information.

They should categories information, if someone wants persona information he should pay for it according to information required, let us see how many still want to use RTI. Only serious will remain.

Seeking information is not a crime. The very purpose of RTI is to serve the information seekers on sound grounds. I learned from some of the members in this discussion that a person wanted to seek the information about all the unmarried teachers of a particular state to find an alliance to his daughter. This is certainly abusing the provision of RTI. Such seekers should be refused. And it is the duty of the information seeker to explain in no uncertain terms to the authorities the purpose for which he is seeking the information.

They should categories information, if someone wants persona information he should pay for it according to information required, let us see how many still want to use RTI. Only serious will remain.

Seeking information is not a crime. The very purpose of RTI is to serve the information seekers on sound grounds. I learned from some of the members in this discussion that a person wanted to seek the information about all the unmarried teachers of a particular state to find an alliance to his daughter. This is certainly abusing the provision of RTI. Such seekers should be refused. And it is the duty of the information seeker to explain in no uncertain terms to the authorities the purpose for which he is seeking the information.

They should categories information, if someone wants persona information he should pay for it according to information required, let us see how many still want to use RTI. Only serious will remain.

The information supplied is not free. You have to pay Rs. ten with application. If the cost is more, there will be more demand. Most people ask only relevant information which will suit their purpose. But there are many who have ample money to pay for any information. This is their past time as they have money but no other work to do.

Seeking information is not a crime. The very purpose of RTI is to serve the information seekers on sound grounds. I learned from some of the members in this discussion that a person wanted to seek the information about all the unmarried teachers of a particular state to find an alliance to his daughter. This is certainly abusing the provision of RTI. Such seekers should be refused. And it is the duty of the information seeker to explain in no uncertain terms to the authorities the purpose for which he is seeking the information.

They should categories information, if someone wants persona information he should pay for it according to information required, let us see how many still want to use RTI. Only serious will remain.

The information supplied is not free. You have to pay Rs. ten with application. If the cost is more, there will be more demand. Most people ask only relevant information which will suit their purpose. But there are many who have ample money to pay for any information. This is their past time as they have money but no other work to do.

If I have more money and ready to pay any amount. RTI authorities will give any information ? The purpose of the information should be well within the jurisdiction of the RTI rules. For this RTI should provide a clear cut set of rules where in it should be clearly stated what information one can demand and what not.

Now Supreme Court has also remarked that the Information Officers generally do not maintain balance between right to information and right to privacy. What is not of public interest need not be disclosed under RTI.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Erred-in-order-on-RTI-panel-heads-SC-says/articleshow/22272853.cms