Did anyone ask this question from ManMohan singh when he said openly the first use of National wealth belongs to them who divided this country into three and trying to divide it further more? 

And what is wrong with Ram Bhktas in a country where half the people have RAM in their names?

It's a tirade  sans sense. A mission 'fault finding'. Even if BJP quotes from Ramayana, its seen as  a dirty porn.

I will not be surprised if they ridicule Ramayana for having the name of Ram in the book tomorrow. One should be careful while talking about Ram or Ramayana in this country. 

Any amount of ridicules cannot tarnish the value of Ramayana in this country.

Atheism in fact gives you right to stay away from believing or rejecting your belief in the existence of gods of all kinds but gives you no right to criticism others for their personal belief.  

All persons are bhaktas of some god or godman. That is not an issue. What Gadkari said was "that this government is of Rambhaktas" thereby meaning that those who believe in other gods than Rama are not of concern to the govt. In saying so there is a deeper meaning and such statements are made n a calculated manner to draw a polarised response and bond certain class of bhaktas together. What is the need for minister to make such statement.  In fact they enjoy doing so because it draws typical responses as is seen in this forum also. Ramayana is a great story which has withstood the vagaries of time. I do not agree that Rambhaktas do not have Swiss accounts. Have you not heard  " Moonh me Ram bhagal mein Choori"

Then he's not a Rambhakta.

At Ram temples it is he who is welcomed with open arms.