usha manohar wrote:

All the Kashmiri leaders hold on to this special status and recently Omar Abdullah another dynasty leader was threatening , saying that he wd never ever support any move to do away with it. In fact it is his gang that hasdone the maximum damage to the valley through their double dealings

It is question in my mind that situation inJ&K is worst at this time when common citizen of Kashmir helping terrorist openly, what will happen if government removed section 370?

This happens only in India that so called minority people can give threat to majority and our government is unable to give protection to majority community. Can you see this in Pakistan or Bangladesh.?

anil wrote:

usha manohar wrote:

All the Kashmiri leaders hold on to this special status and recently Omar Abdullah another dynasty leader was threatening , saying that he wd never ever support any move to do away with it. In fact it is his gang that hasdone the maximum damage to the valley through their double dealings

It is question in my mind that situation inJ&K is worst at this time when common citizen of Kashmir helping terrorist openly, what will happen if government removed section 370?

So far all govts held back from removing sec 370 because they did not want to go against minorities. But I ask does the nation comes first ? If so why will minorities be upset at setting things right in their own.country..If they get upset ,they have no right to be the citizens of this country.

Most probably, the Kashmiri pandits have settled in various parts of India. Many of the new generation Kashmiri Pandits might have not even been born in Kashmir. This is similar So is refugees from present West Pakistan. Generations have changed. At this stage any talk of rehabilitation is futile.   For example, Anupam Kher- a Kashmiri was actually educated in Simla. He is well settled and need not be rehabilitated in Kashmir. 

There is always a possibility of some elderly and nostalgic Kashmiris returning. Already opposition to the move has started. It will be unsafe to return in such hostile circumstances.

Manoj Kumar Lamba wrote:

This happens only in India that so called minority people can give threat to majority and our government is unable to give protection to majority community. Can you see this in Pakistan or Bangladesh.?

Most of country of the world have one religion but India have many religion, so it is not possible here that is possible in Pakistan and Bangladesh. Citizen of Pakistan and Bangladesh who are belongs to religion other than Islam are second grade citizen. But in in India they are special citizen.

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

Most probably, the Kashmiri pandits have settled in various parts of India. Many of the new generation Kashmiri Pandits might have not even been born in Kashmir. This is similar So is refugees from present West Pakistan. Generations have changed. At this stage any talk of rehabilitation is futile.   For example, Anupam Kher- a Kashmiri was actually educated in Simla. He is well settled and need not be rehabilitated in Kashmir. 

Big difference between refugees from present West Pakistan and migrated people from Kashmir. Kashmir is state of India. It may be true that Kashmiri Pandits are not interested in settled back in Kashmir but they are interested in property which they left there.

usha manohar wrote:

anil wrote:

usha manohar wrote:

All the Kashmiri leaders hold on to this special status and recently Omar Abdullah another dynasty leader was threatening , saying that he wd never ever support any move to do away with it. In fact it is his gang that hasdone the maximum damage to the valley through their double dealings

It is question in my mind that situation inJ&K is worst at this time when common citizen of Kashmir helping terrorist openly, what will happen if government removed section 370?

So far all govts held back from removing sec 370 because they did not want to go against minorities. But I ask does the nation comes first ? If so why will minorities be upset at setting things right in their own.country..If they get upset ,they have no right to be the citizens of this country.

In Kashmir Hindus are minorities not Muslim, 

anil wrote:

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

Most probably, the Kashmiri pandits have settled in various parts of India. Many of the new generation Kashmiri Pandits might have not even been born in Kashmir. This is similar So is refugees from present West Pakistan. Generations have changed. At this stage any talk of rehabilitation is futile.   For example, Anupam Kher- a Kashmiri was actually educated in Simla. He is well settled and need not be rehabilitated in Kashmir. 

Big difference between refugees from present West Pakistan and migrated people from Kashmir. Kashmir is state of India. It may be true that Kashmiri Pandits are not interested in settled back in Kashmir but they are interested in property which they left there.

You are absolutely right ! Most Indians want to gloss over  issues that concern minorities and that is precisely why they tend to sit on our heads or else how do they have the ghuts to call the shots.One can only blame , we all know who ..

Gulshan Kumar Ajmani wrote:

Most probably, the Kashmiri pandits have settled in various parts of India. Many of the new generation Kashmiri Pandits might have not even been born in Kashmir. This is similar So is refugees from present West Pakistan. Generations have changed. At this stage any talk of rehabilitation is futile.   For example, Anupam Kher- a Kashmiri was actually educated in Simla. He is well settled and need not be rehabilitated in Kashmir. 

Those Kashmiri Pandits who settled outside Kashmir,  should  better stay outside only. The present Kashmir is not that Kashmir, which used to be a Heaven or Zannat.