India's fundamental right says that both man and woman has equal rights do you feel it is true when you compared it into the case of womens cricket in India?

Joseph Jose
www.smart4posts.blogspot.com

Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
yes not only womens cricket all play should be given importance but unfortunately mens cricket get more importance.

www.mobileeduhut.blogspot.in
India's fundamental right says that both man and woman has equal rights do you feel it is true when you compared it into the case of womens cricket in India?


That's true all are equal but in actual not all things which are ideal are followed. :evil: Men's cricket of course is given more importance than any of the sport in India and that's the major reason why we always come at the bottom in the medal tally in the games like Olympics. :evil:
There is equality of opportunities. This does not ensure equality of performance. There is no discrimination against women players. Ultimately performance counts- men or women.

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

There is equality of opportunities. This does not ensure equality of performance. There is no discrimination against women players. Ultimately performance counts- men or women.


But women cricketers have given good performance. :)

Thing is they are not able to attract crwd like men cricketers are and ultimately don't able to generate revenues like men. :blink:
Everyone has talent there is no difference between women and men. When we look at the crowd the most of the people don't know there is cricket for womens. They are also talented but there is no opportunities for them.

Joseph Jose
www.smart4posts.blogspot.com

I agree with SAJ... Its not only woman's cricket, every other sports is not getting that importance as Man's cricket.

ANDROIOS: http://androios-tweaks.blogspot.com
There is equality of opportunities. This does not ensure equality of performance. There is no discrimination against women players. Ultimately performance counts- men or women.


But women cricketers have given good performance. :)

Thing is they are not able to attract crwd like men cricketers are and ultimately don't able to generate revenues like men. :blink:


Attracting crowd is also significant. This indicates popularity. Colgate is most popular whereas other rival products may also be of similar quality. This is unavoidable in competitive world. Nobody is to blame for this.

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

I think our Women cricket is little weak in playing.
The popularity is not much and if they don't play,then their popularity will decrease.

I just know 2 to 3 cricketers in Women's cricket.

Mitali Raj - Captain and batsman, Anjum Chopra - Batsman and Commentator, Jhulam Goswami - Former Captain and bowler

Want to make each day Accountable

Everyone has talent there is no difference between women and men. When we look at the crowd the most of the people don't know there is cricket for womens. They are also talented but there is no opportunities for them.

Yes! It is really appreciable that women have entered in the field of cricket and are successful. But their talent is not projected in a proper way. The women's cricket is not at all popular may be because lack of publicity, training, sponsorship and dominating effect of men's cricket.
Women also have cricket match, but it is not much famous and competative compare to men

Slow and Steady Wins the Race.

You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.