War can never lead to peace. Destruction means demolishing so if the party is demolished how cqn we expect any peace. If people think that war can lead to soft bilateral relations then, I feel that if we destruct and deteriotes one's power, the other people who are in favour of that particular party would rise and would lead to both-sided destruction instead of peace. Killing or destructing is just hazardous and self-annihiliating. If peace is required, diplomatic relations should promote mutual benefit. Results of better mutual benefits have always been fruitful and will remain so forever. At one side, we discourage terrorisms and civil wars because they are destructive and demolishes peace then, howcome we are promoting destruction and wars for peace.

It all depends on the other side of the party. If the other party provokes with an intention of destabilizing the country, do you think we should the song of Peace. A thorn should be used to remove a thorn.

Apart from this I would like to add on that in the mythology of India both the epics ramayan and Mahabharat had wars but it is notable that first the heroes both Shri Ram ( and army) and Shri krishan alobg with Arjun and Family demanded peaceful diplomatic agreement firstly and war was secondary. In the case if the other party wants destruction, it is their lack of knowledge or rather-

" Vinashkaale vipreet budhi".

However, war leads to destruction only. In the case of mahabharat only a handful of people were alive after the 13 day war who were of a same team, so peace was derermined. In the Ramayan also, Ravan and his supporters died and Shri Ram had been always peaceful, if he was not have been so, he would have never accepted the exile.

Basically war became a need of situation not a source of peace. It was about ending evils and peace was never a criteria of requirements.

A thorn can remove a thorn but what about the several other thorns coming in the way? 

Also if a thorn removes the other, only one is left. A Single palm cannot clap similarly, with single thorn there is no point of peace and war. Its over basically , one thorn ends and other rules.

War is an extreme form of negotiation to settle a dispute if other peaceful means fail. Destruction can be peaceful or violent. In technology we see it happening all the time. Mobiles have killed landlines, PC and laptops and cameras (Kodak has closed down),watches, CD's and so on. Progress means replacing the old. In the process people who earned from the old lose their jobs and livelihood and are put to trouble.  

We are discussing about the imminent destruction, when other peaceful efforts fail.

So.

"So" ? What does  it mean ?

It means without any doubt.

A criminal wastage of space. Please ensure as much as possible to be crisp, compact and clear in responses. Spreading a simple response into 2 pages, which could have done in a single page amounts to spam For the same reason the Administration views serial posting one after another seriously.