E.V.M or ballot paper

It is just another political drama. I do not find any fault in EVM and it has been proved again and again that they can not be tampered. But still so much of hue and cry over it. It is just another distraction. 

With EVM, declaration of results has become very fast. And since so far, it has not been exactly proved that they can be tampered with, it ll be better if it is continued.

EVM is much more better than paper as paper can be easily destroyed and captured. People have started to point fingers at EVM just to take political advantage.

Evm is always better than the ballot box as in the later there are chances of corruption, also it takes time for the results where the votes are manually counted. 

I am.anazed that when parties don't win elections they blame everything else except introspect. The same is the case here , ballot papers have so much more scope for tampering and because of that EVMs which are a better bet , although may not be perfect, were introduced. It also shows that parties like Congress have won elections many a times by tampering, so prefer ballot papers.

usha manohar wrote:

I am.anazed that when parties don't win elections they blame everything else except introspect. The same is the case here , ballot papers have so much more scope for tampering and because of that EVMs which are a better bet , although may not be perfect, were introduced. It also shows that parties like Congress have won elections many a times by tampering, so prefer ballot papers.

In election when opposition parties won EVM is fine one. Indeed booth capturing is policy of some parties. So they are crying, because booth capturing is not possible is case of EVM.