Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
  • Re: Isn't it fair that the two largest parties form an alliance?

    by » 4 years ago


    The alliance's between BJP and MNS


  • Re: Isn't it fair that the two largest parties form an alliance?

    by » 4 years ago


    Honestly you are the limit rambabu, you simply post your nonsensical stuff for the sake of doing so. Now is the time to post a link showing alliance between BJP and MNS ..

    Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!


  • Re: Isn't it fair that the two largest parties form an alliance?

    by » 4 years ago


    vijay wrote:
    Formation of government is by a party or parties who can muster a majority. There is nothing wrong in smaller parties coming together. It is their right. Why do you always crib at any other party except BJP. They have also formed government's in collaboration with diametric opposite parties to their ideologies.

    yes nothing is wrong in it if they join hand on the basis of common agenda.. In present ideologies is meaning less, power is all thing.  But their alliance must be work for 5 years. 


  • Re: Isn't it fair that the two largest parties form an alliance?

    by » 4 years ago


    @ Usha

    I already said the alliance between MNS BJP is dropped.

     


  • Re: Isn't it fair that the two largest parties form an alliance?

    by » 4 years ago


    If there is a rule that the two top parties have to form a government , automatically they will come to an understanding which is what is democracy is all about not the horse trading kind introduced and nurtured by some parties which has become the norm now !


    Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!


  • Re: Isn't it fair that the two largest parties form an alliance?

    by » 4 years ago


    by  » 20 minutes ago


    The alliance's between BJP and MNS..

     

    So what was this ? The problem is you want to butt in everywhere although you have precious little to contribute , just to add on points. Why don't you take a break ?


    Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!


  • Re: Isn't it fair that the two largest parties form an alliance?

    by » 4 years ago


    usha manohar wrote:

    If there is a rule that the two top parties have to form a government , automatically they will come to an understanding which is what is democracy is all about not the horse trading kind introduced and nurtured by some parties which has become the norm now !

    Yes restriction on horse trading may be possible with this rule. But it is not possible in democracy. This rule will be infraction of right of equality.


  • Re: Isn't it fair that the two largest parties form an alliance?

    by » 4 years ago


    # Uaha. Very soon, I am going to take a break

  • Re: Isn't it fair that the two largest parties form an alliance?

    by » 4 years ago


    anil wrote:
    usha manohar wrote:

    If there is a rule that the two top parties have to form a government , automatically they will come to an understanding which is what is democracy is all about not the horse trading kind introduced and nurtured by some parties which has become the norm now !

    Yes restriction on horse trading may be possible with this rule. But it is not possible in democracy. This rule will be infraction of right of equality.

    What is the meaning of infraction of right of equality and what is equality if not the majority consensus?


    Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!


  • Re: Isn't it fair that the two largest parties form an alliance?

    by » 4 years ago


    usha manohar wrote:
    anil wrote:
    usha manohar wrote:

    If there is a rule that the two top parties have to form a government , automatically they will come to an understanding which is what is democracy is all about not the horse trading kind introduced and nurtured by some parties which has become the norm now !

    Yes restriction on horse trading may be possible with this rule. But it is not possible in democracy. This rule will be infraction of right of equality.

    What is the meaning of infraction of right of equality and what is equality if not the majority consensus?

    If it is rule that only top two parties can form government that it stop others parties to make alliance. If A and B partied are two top parties butC, D and E parties have jointly more seats than A or B, how can they  alliance with A or B party. 


You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.