For the past few days my mind is seized with things which I honestly believe can contribute to making our site a much better one provided the administration take these seriously and implement them expeditiously.

1.When it comes to awarding cash credits to articles the present system should be modified in the form of making it provisional and it should be allowed to enjoy further credits if it manages to have roaring number of hits. It has been my personal experience that my articles which were not favored with decent cash credits went on to become 'hot' ones, clearly pointing to editorial deficiency.If this suggestion is implemented the frequent complaints of unfair cash credits could be taken care of and at the same time the system could freed from 'subjectivity' to make it more objective.The only problem I foresee is manipulative hits which I believe could be addressed by the right software.

2.The performance of moderators and editors should come in for evaluation.Don't make it an elelphantine team! A few efficient moderators and editors can do a hell lot better than an elephantine team of comatose members.Only the site has to ensure decent monetary incentives to them.

3.The quality of language is a factor that decides the image of the site.Bodduanan allows too much liberty in assaulting grammatical rules of most rudimentary kind on the plea that everyone is not supposed to be good at them.I find that very ridiculous. If I choose a particular language as medium of communication I owe it to myself to be familar with its grammar and vocabulary.Even post graduates are seen making sentence like 'I does'! If someone is consciously ignorant he or she can take suitable measures to remedy it but what about members who are happy about it and display a 'devil-may-care' attitude!

Let me know your views!