In a survey, Russians have appreciated Soviet Communist system. It appears that the 'distant' always looks better.

http://rbth.ru/news/2013/10/12/about_60_percent_of_russians_see_communism_as_good_system_-_poll_30755.html

In a survey, Russians have appreciated Soviet Communist system. It appears that the 'distant' always looks better.

http://rbth.ru/news/2013/10/12/about_60_percent_of_russians_see_communism_as_good_system_-_poll_30755.html

Or the past always looks better as some of us think that even the British period was better than the present political scenario in India.

In a survey, Russians have appreciated Soviet Communist system. It appears that the 'distant' always looks better.

http://rbth.ru/news/2013/10/12/about_60_percent_of_russians_see_communism_as_good_system_-_poll_30755.html

Or the past always looks better as some of us think that even the British period was better than the present political scenario in India.

Past looks good when the conditions deteriorate in the present. Naturally there arises a scope for comparison.

In a survey, Russians have appreciated Soviet Communist system. It appears that the 'distant' always looks better.

http://rbth.ru/news/2013/10/12/about_60_percent_of_russians_see_communism_as_good_system_-_poll_30755.html

Or the past always looks better as some of us think that even the British period was better than the present political scenario in India.

Past looks good when the conditions deteriorate in the present. Naturally there arises a scope for comparison.

Communism is not all that bad as capitalist propagate it or the communist did not make it look that way. It was a way for collective progress with the only aim that every available asset was for every one on equal basis.

In a survey, Russians have appreciated Soviet Communist system. It appears that the 'distant' always looks better.

http://rbth.ru/news/2013/10/12/about_60_percent_of_russians_see_communism_as_good_system_-_poll_30755.html

Or the past always looks better as some of us think that even the British period was better than the present political scenario in India.

Past looks good when the conditions deteriorate in the present. Naturally there arises a scope for comparison.

Communism is not all that bad as capitalist propagate it or the communist did not make it look that way. It was a way for collective progress with the only aim that every available asset was for every one on equal basis.

And from this communism, we have taken the format of 'collective farming' in 60s. Naturally communism looks like a demon for a capitalist and vice versa.

In a survey, Russians have appreciated Soviet Communist system. It appears that the 'distant' always looks better.

http://rbth.ru/news/2013/10/12/about_60_percent_of_russians_see_communism_as_good_system_-_poll_30755.html

Or the past always looks better as some of us think that even the British period was better than the present political scenario in India.

Past looks good when the conditions deteriorate in the present. Naturally there arises a scope for comparison.

Communism is not all that bad as capitalist propagate it or the communist did not make it look that way. It was a way for collective progress with the only aim that every available asset was for every one on equal basis.

And from this communism, we have taken the format of 'collective farming' in 60s. Naturally communism looks like a demon for a capitalist and vice versa.

Communists kept every thing behind iron curtain giving them opportunity to fowl play.

In a survey, Russians have appreciated Soviet Communist system. It appears that the 'distant' always looks better.

http://rbth.ru/news/2013/10/12/about_60_percent_of_russians_see_communism_as_good_system_-_poll_30755.html

Or the past always looks better as some of us think that even the British period was better than the present political scenario in India.

Past looks good when the conditions deteriorate in the present. Naturally there arises a scope for comparison.

Communism is not all that bad as capitalist propagate it or the communist did not make it look that way. It was a way for collective progress with the only aim that every available asset was for every one on equal basis.

Actually communism is grossly misinterpreted. In fact the proletariat is that class in society which lives entirely from the sale of its labor and does not draw profit from any kind of capital, The life and death, whose sole existence depends on the demand for labor is what communism is.
The machines, which were very expensive and hence could be bought only by big capitalists, altered the whole mode of production and displaced the former workers, That's how Marx thought of communism. Which all was converted to a self styled communism in later stages that made all the difference.

Actually communism is grossly misinterpreted. In fact the proletariat is that class in society which lives entirely from the sale of its labor and does not draw profit from any kind of capital, The life and death, whose sole existence depends on the demand for labor is what communism is.
The machines, which were very expensive and hence could be bought only by big capitalists, altered the whole mode of production and displaced the former workers, That's how Marx thought of communism. Which all was converted to a self styled communism in later stages that made all the difference.

Factions and divisions based on power mongering , self styled communists disfigured the very concept of Communism. These groups even brought the word "Communalism" in to Communism, which was not in the Communism. Purists say, the present Communism is not Communism.