Do you think occupying foot path for living is good or fair?
Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
didn't get your point???
Ideally I would prefer our pavements free of hawkers.In our part it's not the beggars but the hawkers who have made footwalks as their permanent places of business!
Most of the cities footpath occupied by illegal stalls this is the biggest problem for pedestrians.... :kiss:
No it is not good. Actually there is no question of fair or unfair.If needy people who do not have their habitats,need to sleep, where do they go.It is the govt who has to think and act seriously about it.

However, it should be stopped and they should be given the alternative as most of the public is getting affected due to it.

Arise Awake and Rest Not till the Goal is Achieved.
The pavements are meant for pedestrians and the situation is very grim in Kolkata.There was a much-hyped drive against hawkers who have permanent stalls but such is power of our destructive politics nothing came out of it!
I think everything should be used for intended purpose. Foot path are, as name suggests, for use by pedestrians. There is lack of discipline and propriety that causes inappropriate use of everything. Even gas cylinders for domestic use are being used for commercial use and even for driving vehicles.

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

footpath is for those who pass by the path and covering it will block the way.
Occupying foot path for living is not at all good nor fair, foot paths are for the crowd to walk safely

http://beautytipsforflawlessskin.blogspot.com/

Footpaths are for pedestrians.Only when they are free we can enjoy the beauty and vastness of the street.

Visit my blogs:

http://abidareacode.blogspot.com
You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.