The topic is locked.
Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
  • Re: No Need to Be Careful

    by » 5 years ago


    anil
    MAESTRO MATE
    220 6.73k 39.2k
    suni51 wrote:

    It doesn't serve the purpose of site so admin will not do that but he should at least put a limit of 30 minutes in between TWO clicks.

    Yours suggestion is good one but, I think 15 minutes between 2 clicks in enough. 

     


  • Re: No Need to Be Careful

    by » 5 years ago


    vijay
    Diamond Mate
    31 4.98k 28.3k

    but why are you all so keen to give points to read an article. What do these points bring/ mean. The same 10 persons get peanuts every weak. delink the points from article reading. If viewership falls bring it back.


  • Re: No Need to Be Careful

    by » 5 years ago


    Suny Ag
    Editor & Super Moderator
    253 20k 141.2k

    To be very frank a site needs revenue to pay its users and if no one clicks at different features there won't be any money to pay. Personally I am not in favor of points for LIKE and Clicks but that's how the cookie crumbles.


    I love this free image hosting site for sharing my work

    https://o0.nz/


  • Re: No Need to Be Careful

    by » 5 years ago


    anil
    MAESTRO MATE
    220 6.73k 39.2k
    vijay wrote:

    but why are you all so keen to give points to read an article. What do these points bring/ mean. The same 10 persons get peanuts every weak. delink the points from article reading. If viewership falls bring it back.

    It is my opinion that members who are active few of them visit each days article pages. I rare view articles. So it is also good option that no points credited for reading articles.

     


  • Re: No Need to Be Careful

    by » 5 years ago


    rambabu
    Perandor
    1.49k 32k 218.8k
    anil wrote:
    vijay wrote:

    but why are you all so keen to give points to read an article. What do these points bring/ mean. The same 10 persons get peanuts every weak. delink the points from article reading. If viewership falls bring it back.

    It is my opinion that members who are active few of them visit each days article pages. I rare view articles. So it is also good option that no points credited for reading articles.

    Thi point I raised earlir. But Sunil said as of now its not feasible.

     

     


  • Re: No Need to Be Careful

    by » 5 years ago


    Babu saroj
    Platinum Mate
    33 1.23k 9.47k

    If reading an articles helps one to be on the top of the leader board  then what it is wrong and if it is wrong then there should be no point for reading an articles.


    bhuyali saroj


  • Re: No Need to Be Careful

    by » 5 years ago


    rambabu
    Perandor
    1.49k 32k 218.8k

    Reading articles is allowed. Many members read articles to gather information either to  use for their article to be written or to avoid duplicacy in their article. But one should not build up his entire points base only ticking on articles and Likes. A member is expected to take part in other activities like Forums, Article writing and Q&A.

     


  • Re: No Need to Be Careful

    by » 5 years ago


    usha manohar
    Basileus
    704 19.5k 126.1k
    Babu saroj wrote:

    If reading an articles helps one to be on the top of the leader board  then what it is wrong and if it is wrong then there should be no point for reading an articles.

    Hello, weren't you the one who made noise, even started s thread about members reading articles and getting points just sometime back. Please stick to one stand rather than change at the drop of a hat like some members do here , just yo suit their own needs ..


    Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!


  • Re: No Need to Be Careful

    by » 5 years ago


    Suny Ag
    Editor & Super Moderator
    253 20k 141.2k
    Babu saroj wrote:

    If reading an articles helps one to be on the top of the leader board  then what it is wrong and if it is wrong then there should be no point for reading an articles.

    Are you suggesting that people should stop everything else and start clicking. By the way you did not read a single article but clicked at them. You clicked at 223 articles within 20-30 minutes. Could you read even titles while going at that speed?

     


    I love this free image hosting site for sharing my work

    https://o0.nz/


    Thank you said by: Kalyani Nandurkar

  • Re: No Need to Be Careful

    by » 5 years ago


    usha manohar
    Basileus
    704 19.5k 126.1k

    Lol many of our members do read at that speed,even at a faster rate if necessary to reach the minimum requirements..

     

     


    Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!


You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.

Is Maverick Solve your problem Ever ?

Is Maverick Solve your problem Ever ? vote it friends.....
No answer selected. Please try again.
Please select either existing option or enter your own, however not both.
Please select minimum 0 answer(s) and maximum 2 answer(s).
/polls/boddunan/6010-is-maverick-solve-your-problem-ever-.json?task=poll.vote
6010
radio
[{"id":"20729","title":"Yes","votes":"68","type":"x","order":"0","pct":73.12,"resources":[]},{"id":"20730","title":"No","votes":"25","type":"x","order":"0","pct":26.88,"resources":[]}] ["#ff5b00","#4ac0f2","#b80028","#eef66c","#60bb22","#b96a9a","#62c2cc"] ["rgba(255,91,0,0.7)","rgba(74,192,242,0.7)","rgba(184,0,40,0.7)","rgba(238,246,108,0.7)","rgba(96,187,34,0.7)","rgba(185,106,154,0.7)","rgba(98,194,204,0.7)"] 350
bottom 200
SUBHADRA
1 points