Maximum number of communal riots, scams and all other ills took place during the UPA rule and they happily played politics blaming "Saffron Party" and everybody else but analyse and see what their own shortcomings were . The whole Congress and related parties are beginning to sound like broken gramaphone records repeating Secular,saffron,agenda blah blah....They seem to have nothing else to speak about because if they open their mouth on other issues all their misdeeds would tumble out..

We have to differentiate between inefficient watchman and thief. The 'secular parties' have proved 'inefficient chowkidar or watchmen'. But they can't be equated with fascist criminals.

That entirely depends on ones point of view, whether looting the country is better or trying to remain traditional and holding on to your cultural values, may be going overboard at times is better !

When you talk of looting the country or corruption, this refers to fiancial irregulaitis or mismanagement of national economy. This issue is also significant. No doubt the previous government miserably failed in this regard. Communalism, fascism and religious chauvanism, causing hatred between commuities- this is anther aspect. When we discuss one thing, this need not be mixed with another.

Maximum number of communal riots, scams and all other ills took place during the UPA rule and they happily played politics blaming "Saffron Party" and everybody else but analyse and see what their own shortcomings were . The whole Congress and related parties are beginning to sound like broken gramaphone records repeating Secular,saffron,agenda blah blah....They seem to have nothing else to speak about because if they open their mouth on other issues all their misdeeds would tumble out..

We have to differentiate between inefficient watchman and thief. The 'secular parties' have proved 'inefficient chowkidar or watchmen'. But they can't be equated with fascist criminals.

due to seudo seculars parties caused 84 riots and other innumerable riots. Real fascists people are seudo secular.

I'm of the opinion, we can classify Pseudo secularism or real secularism, only when Secularism is there in India. My question is, "Is there Secularism in India?"

One member has cite 1984 riots to prove pseudo secularism of congress. The riots occured in backdrop of Indira gandhi's assasination. This was really shameful to revege against enie commuinty for murder of Indira Gandhi. I agree that Congress i also ot really as secular as should be The RSS and its outfits are saffron wheras Congress is soft saffron. I also wish to stress n the facts that the extreme Khaistan elements led by Bhindarewale were killing innocent other community people daily by dragging from buses. Not a single Akali leader even raised voice against those killings- not to speak of fighting the terorist menace of Khalistanis. This would also have been a cause of hatred in the 1984 riots.
However the communalism of the saffron brigade is very deep rooted. We cannot brush this aside by comparing with 1984 riots.

Maximum number of communal riots, scams and all other ills took place during the UPA rule and they happily played politics blaming "Saffron Party" and everybody else but analyse and see what their own shortcomings were . The whole Congress and related parties are beginning to sound like broken gramaphone records repeating Secular,saffron,agenda blah blah....They seem to have nothing else to speak about because if they open their mouth on other issues all their misdeeds would tumble out..

We have to differentiate between inefficient watchman and thief. The 'secular parties' have proved 'inefficient chowkidar or watchmen'. But they can't be equated with fascist criminals.

That entirely depends on ones point of view, whether looting the country is better or trying to remain traditional and holding on to your cultural values, may be going overboard at times is better !

When you talk of looting the country or corruption, this refers to fiancial irregulaitis or mismanagement of national economy. This issue is also significant. No doubt the previous government miserably failed in this regard. Communalism, fascism and religious chauvanism, causing hatred between commuities- this is anther aspect. When we discuss one thing, this need not be mixed with another.

That is again ones own point of view, when it is a case of governance everthing gets due prominenance esp corruption issues ...

I agree that corruption and fascism are both significant. But both needs be searately discussed and not inter mingled or mixed up as this adds to confusion and we can't discus anything properly. afterall while studing maths, you don't talk of literature or history.

I agree that corruption and fascism are both significant. But both needs be searately discussed and not inter mingled or mixed up as this adds to confusion and we can't discus anything properly. afterall while studing maths, you don't talk of literature or history.

In a discussion forum all aspects of a subject can be discussed and it has been done time and again here on this forum several times, in fact going much beyond the subject at times , so there is no confusion since all members who are interested in discussing the matter are mature enough and are aware of the facts and know what they are discussing about...

I agree that corruption and fascism are both significant. But both needs be searately discussed and not inter mingled or mixed up as this adds to confusion and we can't discus anything properly. afterall while studing maths, you don't talk of literature or history.

In a discussion forum all aspects of a subject can be discussed and it has been done time and again here on this forum several times, in fact going much beyond the subject at times , so there is no confusion since all members who are interested in discussing the matter are mature enough and are aware of the facts and know what they are discussing about...

Why not, discussion forums are meant to be discussed many aspects of the issue seen from various angles. This is how discussion forums are enlivened.

Supporting one religions is not criteria for secularism or anti secular, in last decade UPA mostly supported one minority community so they are not secular in simialr principle, as always for many years nationalist forces supporting Indian who clearly supports the country. During Congress rule many riots occured so what are these reasons, so why not in similar scale of BJP they should not be called as secular,

In the just concluded US TRIP, Modi said in no uncertain terms, " India believes in the principle VASYDHAIVA KUTUMBAKAM ." Are there any traces of Non - Secularism in his comment ?