Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
Opposition cannot be responsible of what is happening today. Government of the day is responsible, they have authority and responsibility. I have seen in many news channels discussions and here that opposition is responsible, how can it be, they are not in power, it is a very understatement. I do not support, what is happening good and bad in this country because of opposition, no it is because of government of the day, whomso ever it may be, the treasury bench has the authority and power and also they are responsible to legislature and citizens.


Agreed that present government is resposible for what is happening in country. But opposition is not innocent. Exodus and Commotion is not solution to any problem. Why opposition agree with government of issue which are in their interest.


They are only two sides of the same coin but probably a change will change the situation to a certain point.


This is correct. Even if your two shirts are similar, you wear these turn by turn.

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

The major difference between BJP and Congress is that Congress is duble faced and calls itself secular while discriminating openly about Hindus...wheras BJP is open about its intentions of protecting the rights of Hindus although they take it too far at times...

Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!

The major difference between BJP and Congress is that Congress is duble faced and calls itself secular while discriminating openly about Hindus...wheras BJP is open about its intentions of protecting the rights of Hindus although they take it too far at times...


Sometimes it becomes necessary, where else will they take them if not even in their own country? Do Hindus have any right anywhere else if not even in India? When the pseudo-secular would learn to behave what is just and right.

I love this free image hosting site for sharing my work

https://o0.nz/

The major difference between BJP and Congress is that Congress is duble faced and calls itself secular while discriminating openly about Hindus...wheras BJP is open about its intentions of protecting the rights of Hindus although they take it too far at times...


Sometimes it becomes necessary, where else will they take them if not even in their own country? Do Hindus have any right anywhere else if not even in India? When the pseudo-secular would learn to behave what is just and right.


Human rights are more important than perceived rights on religion. Religious freedom is also a human right. Discrimination on basis of religion is also a violation of human rights. Hindus have also like others human rights not only in India but also elsewhere. There are Hindu temples in the entire world. Britain and USA have also Hindu temples as well as Sikh Gurdwaras. Hindus have rights in India and also in other countries- not as Hindus but as citizens of respective countries. This is true about other religious communities also. If BJP thinks about protecting rights of Hindus only and not others, this is definitely non secular. The phrase- pseudo secularism is coined by saffron brigade to describe their opponents.

G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

The major difference between BJP and Congress is that Congress is duble faced and calls itself secular while discriminating openly about Hindus...wheras BJP is open about its intentions of protecting the rights of Hindus although they take it too far at times...


Sometimes it becomes necessary, where else will they take them if not even in their own country? Do Hindus have any right anywhere else if not even in India? When the pseudo-secular would learn to behave what is just and right.


Human rights are more important than perceived rights on religion. Religious freedom is also a human right. Discrimination on basis of religion is also a violation of human rights. Hindus have also like others human rights not only in India but also elsewhere. There are Hindu temples in the entire world. Britain and USA have also Hindu temples as well as Sikh Gurdwaras. Hindus have rights in India and also in other countries- not as Hindus but as citizens of respective countries. This is true about other religious communities also. If BJP thinks about protecting rights of Hindus only and not others, this is definitely non secular. The phrase- pseudo secularism is coined by saffron brigade to describe their opponents.


Europe and Western countries are a different matter altogether since they dont curtail personal freedom with regard to anything unlike the Easten and Arabian countries ...The very idea os protecting the rights of Hindus comes in only when they feel there is need to do so because of the psuedo secularism being preached by Congress and some other parties like Samajwadi , which has the worst track record for criminalisation...

Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!

The major difference between BJP and Congress is that Congress is duble faced and calls itself secular while discriminating openly about Hindus...wheras BJP is open about its intentions of protecting the rights of Hindus although they take it too far at times...


Sometimes it becomes necessary, where else will they take them if not even in their own country? Do Hindus have any right anywhere else if not even in India? When the pseudo-secular would learn to behave what is just and right.


Human rights are more important than perceived rights on religion. Religious freedom is also a human right. Discrimination on basis of religion is also a violation of human rights. Hindus have also like others human rights not only in India but also elsewhere. There are Hindu temples in the entire world. Britain and USA have also Hindu temples as well as Sikh Gurdwaras. Hindus have rights in India and also in other countries- not as Hindus but as citizens of respective countries. This is true about other religious communities also. If BJP thinks about protecting rights of Hindus only and not others, this is definitely non secular. The phrase- pseudo secularism is coined by saffron brigade to describe their opponents.


There is nothing like saffron brigade in our country but another imaginary trick of pseudo seculars . They want to attract other communities at the cost of tolerant Hindus. By the way, how would anyone describe saffron brigade? Or someone talking about Hindus is enough to classify him a member of saffron brigade? Why not green brigade, red brigade or whatever color it may take to support a particular religion?

I love this free image hosting site for sharing my work

https://o0.nz/

Talking about the bankruptcy of congress, it is funny how Manmohan Singh never opens his mouth if he can...he has the same dumb expression all the time except on occassions when suddenly he comes alive to say that Rahul Gandhi should be made the Prime Minster or the leader of congress or some such thing ! Goes to show aht role he is playing up there, Chamcha of the worst sort !

Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!

Manmohan Singh speaks as much as he is allowed to speak, no more, no lesser. He was made to sit on the chair on one condition and elected PM on this particular condition. He had no political ambitions and willing to step down the moment he got orders from high command. Otherwise there were better candidates who could handle situation more ably but high command could not remain as calm and at at ease as with Manmohan. However, Manmohan saved us from more corruption as he committed lesser scams compared to any one else who could become PM in place of him.

I love this free image hosting site for sharing my work

https://o0.nz/

You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.