I sometimes wonder whether we are going back in time ! What does this judgment do to better a woman's lot ?

I sometimes wonder whether we are going back in time ! What does this judgment do to better a woman's lot ?

What I feel it does all the good for women, as it's the woman's lot who find themselves cheated if something goes wrong. I always hear women complaining in such cases. In case you are talking about forced cases, a woman can accept it or refuse it as in normal marriage.

I sometimes wonder whether we are going back in time ! What does this judgment do to better a woman's lot ?

Only premarital sex must not be ground for marriage but sex during live in relation should be valid ground for marriage.

It all depends on the consent and will of the partners involved and one cannot dictate terms when it is a personal and intimate issue ...

I sometimes wonder whether we are going back in time ! What does this judgment do to better a woman's lot ?

Only premarital sex must not be ground for marriage but sex during live in relation should be valid ground for marriage.

It all depends on the consent and will of the partners involved and one cannot dictate terms when it is a personal and intimate issue ...

I am agreed consent of partner will be must. But policy of use and through is not fair. If some one living in live in relations for some years and if boy refuse to marriage than what a girl do. Boy lost noting but girl lost every thing. We are living in India not in any westren country, where partner is like clothe.

I sometimes wonder whether we are going back in time ! What does this judgment do to better a woman's lot ?

What I feel it does all the good for women, as it's the woman's lot who find themselves cheated if something goes wrong. I always hear women complaining in such cases. In case you are talking about forced cases, a woman can accept it or refuse it as in normal marriage.