Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
It has been argued before supreme court that the case like rape should not be decided on basis of age of accused but on his mental capacity or intellect. The apex court has stayed the verdict by juvenile court.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/delhi-gangrape-verdict-on-accused-juvenile-of-may-be-put-off-subramanian-swamy/1/297230.html


If a person can commit a henious crime , his age should not stand in the way of justice being meted out to him....Here, his mental capacity and intellect are both warped and thats what should be considered while he is being tried for his crime...


he is not 10 or 12 year old. His age is more than 17 years. What is difference between 17 and 18 year. A person who age is 17 years and 10 month in innocent for a crime but just after competing 18 year he is faulty for that crime. What happen with in 2 months. It is not fair.


He deserves punishment irrespective of his age. If he can commit rape so savagely, he can withstand punishment as well. He must pay for what he purchased to let others know that you are not going to roam free if you do not behave.

I love this free image hosting site for sharing my work

https://o0.nz/

You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.