Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.
  • Re: Chemical weapon attack in siria (Damshik)

    by » 6 years ago


    Russia says, no armed intervention in Syria and Syria is firm on its stand that it was not chemical attack. Let them decide first wheter it was a chemical attack or another Iraq is in making.


    Yes that's the point to be proved by the UN observers Only then the issue of intervention arises. UN observers' findings are supposed to be impartial.

  • Re: Chemical weapon attack in siria (Damshik)

    by » 6 years ago


    This is a tragic incident, a show case for the destruction which chemical mass weapons can adhere to and this needs to be stopped at the earliest, two years back the same government used chemical weapons on its own citizens and if we continue to kill people, then this earth which seems to be unique because life is here, ultimately, will become same as planet Mars.

    http://mohanmekap.com/


  • Re: Chemical weapon attack in siria (Damshik)

    by » 6 years ago


    This is a tragic incident, a show case for the destruction which chemical mass weapons can adhere to and this needs to be stopped at the earliest, two years back the same government used chemical weapons on its own citizens and if we continue to kill people, then this earth which seems to be unique because life is here, ultimately, will became same as planet Mars. :lol:


    That day is not far away. Perhaps owing to this reason scientists are exploring an alternative planet for human habitation.

    Thank you said by: mohan manohar

  • Re: Chemical weapon attack in siria (Damshik)

    by » 6 years ago


    Stage set for a military action by America and Britain, even while the the confirmation for the proof that Syria used chemical bombs is yet to arrive. The USA and Britain are of the opinion there is no need to inform the UN for launching a military action against Syria. It seems a war is imminent.

  • Re: Chemical weapon attack in siria (Damshik)

    by » 6 years ago


    It was painful to see the babies and helpless civilians lying dead with the effect of chemical weapons.Why dont allied nations do something about this? how can such a thing be allowed.In fact using any kind of nuclear or chemical weapon should be totally banned..


    It is latest news that USA, world leader going to do some thing. It is not possible to banned nuclear and chemical weapons because develop country wants all other nation stop making nuclear weapons but we will not. Think for one moment Pakistan has nuclear weapons and may be chemical, if some from these will went to terrorist than who save world.


    I agree whatever was used but the fact remains 1300 innocent were killed in this attack. They have yet to ascertain if it was a chemical attack
    http://www.news.com.au/world-news/syria-to-allow-un-to-visit/story-fndir2ev-1226703814684


    Innocent will not come back but it is warning for the rest world. It reminds us gas chambers of Hitler. birds in large number were also died there so it is possible they use chemical weapons.

  • Re: Chemical weapon attack in siria (Damshik)

    by » 6 years ago


    It was painful to see the babies and helpless civilians lying dead with the effect of chemical weapons.Why dont allied nations do something about this? how can such a thing be allowed.In fact using any kind of nuclear or chemical weapon should be totally banned..


    It is latest news that USA, world leader going to do some thing. It is not possible to banned nuclear and chemical weapons because develop country wants all other nation stop making nuclear weapons but we will not. Think for one moment Pakistan has nuclear weapons and may be chemical, if some from these will went to terrorist than who save world.


    I agree whatever was used but the fact remains 1300 innocent were killed in this attack. They have yet to ascertain if it was a chemical attack
    http://www.news.com.au/world-news/syria-to-allow-un-to-visit/story-fndir2ev-1226703814684


    Innocent will not come back but it is warning for the rest world. It reminds us gas chambers of Hitler. birds in large number were also died there so it is possible they use chemical weapons.


    While USA is readying for a military action, Damascus is determined to repel any attack on Syria. This means a stage is set for a mass destruction of people and property. In what way this hasty actions are justified? Is it good to inflict an injury to heal another injury ? What I say is the big bosses should wait till the official confirmation from the UN observers that Syria has used chemical weapons comes out.

You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.