But nothing is safe. They tell in news that all north India may have to suffer greater earthquake in future.

This is about the safety of the Taj which survived the earlier earth quake in Nepal. You are talking about earth quake prone regions in India especially Himalayan regions, Delhi, Kashmir etc. however, most of the Southern states are not earth quake prone regions, though they may experience the tremors.

rambabu wrote:

This is about the safety of the Taj which survived the earlier earth quake in Nepal. You are talking about earth quake prone regions in India especially Himalayan regions, Delhi, Kashmir etc. however, most of the Southern states are not earth quake prone regions, though they may experience the tremors.

 

Yes I am talking about northern region which is earthquake prone and Taj too comes in north India.

 I knowtthat  Agra comes in to northern region. The vital point of the thread is after the first quake in Nepal ASI has conducted a survey and the heritage site the Taj was not effected by earlier earth quake of Nepal. How you can say because the Taj is innorthern India Taj also is in danger without conducting a survey for second time by the ASI?

rambabu wrote:

The intensity indicates its a major earth quake. By evening the amount of damages will be known. Yes anything can happen. 

 

Which damages you are talking about? Is it related to Taj?

It's self explanatory. It was a response to a thread which raised a doubt about the number of deaths in the second earh quake of Nepal.

rambabu wrote:

It's self explanatory. It was a response to a thread which raised a doubt about the number of deaths in the second earh quake of Nepal.

 

Death?? No where in the link it is mentioned. It just talks about monuments.

Sanjeev Gupta wrote:

rambabu wrote:

It's self explanatory. It was a response to a thread which raised a doubt about the number of deaths in the second earh quake of Nepal.

 

Death?? No where in the link it is mentioned. It just talks about monuments.

Please have look at the earlier threads of the discussion.

 

rambabu wrote:

Sanjeev Gupta wrote:

rambabu wrote:

It's self explanatory. It was a response to a thread which raised a doubt about the number of deaths in the second earh quake of Nepal.

 

Death?? No where in the link it is mentioned. It just talks about monuments.

Please have look at the earlier threads of the discussion. But the thread is about damage of monuments from the recent earthquakes so we must discuss it here.

 

 

Sanjeev Gupta wrote:

rambabu wrote:

Sanjeev Gupta wrote:

rambabu wrote:

It's self explanatory. It was a response to a thread which raised a doubt about the number of deaths in the second earh quake of Nepal.

 

Death?? No where in the link it is mentioned. It just talks about monuments.

Please have look at the earlier threads of the discussion. But the thread is about damage of monuments from the recent earthquakes so we must discuss it here.

Then discuss, who's stopping you ?