Actually this procedure is to protect the identity because law says 'one is innocent unless proved otherwise, so they do it to keep their identity undisclosed.

Actually this procedure is to protect the identity because law says 'one is innocent unless proved otherwise, so they do it to keep their identity undisclosed.

But practically speaking, in this case, whose identity are they trying to close anyways?

Actually this procedure is to protect the identity because law says 'one is innocent unless proved otherwise, so they do it to keep their identity undisclosed.

Actually this procedure is to protect the identity because law says 'one is innocent unless proved otherwise, so they do it to keep their identity undisclosed.

If so, not covering face of Sanjay Dutt is well explained. Sanjay Dutt is not an accused but a convict and hence his identity need not be hidden. On the other hand, the Cricket players are being investigated and they are not yet convicts. so their face needs be covered.

Actually this procedure is to protect the identity because law says 'one is innocent unless proved otherwise, so they do it to keep their identity undisclosed.

If so, not covering face of Sanjay Dutt is well explained. Sanjay Dutt is not an accused but a convict and hence his identity need not be hidden. On the other hand, the Cricket players are being investigated and they are not yet convicts. so their face needs be covered.

That's true, once convicted the faces are not covered because the stage of identity parade is over by then.

Actually this procedure is to protect the identity because law says 'one is innocent unless proved otherwise, so they do it to keep their identity undisclosed.

If so, not covering face of Sanjay Dutt is well explained. Sanjay Dutt is not an accused but a convict and hence his identity need not be hidden. On the other hand, the Cricket players are being investigated and they are not yet convicts. so their face needs be covered.

That's true, once convicted the faces are not covered because the stage of identity parade is over by then.

That may be true what you said. But don't you think in this case it was just a formality, as if no one knew their faces......or who they were....... :woohoo: :woohoo:

Actually this procedure is to protect the identity because law says 'one is innocent unless proved otherwise, so they do it to keep their identity undisclosed.

If so, not covering face of Sanjay Dutt is well explained. Sanjay Dutt is not an accused but a convict and hence his identity need not be hidden. On the other hand, the Cricket players are being investigated and they are not yet convicts. so their face needs be covered.

That's true, once convicted the faces are not covered because the stage of identity parade is over by then.

That may be true what you said. But don't you think in this case it was just a formality, as if no one knew their faces......or who they were....... :woohoo: :woohoo:

Probably a case of false shame and outraged dignity!!! :evil: :laugh: