I have often wondered how it would feel writing 1000 articles. If I were to add up all my articles on different sites, I can easily cross the 850 mark. But I am talking about having 1000 articles on only one site. How about that :woohoo:

Without wanting to dampen your enthusiasm I would say that quantity should never be a priority....I have seen some who have written 2000 + articles consisting of 400-500 words and most of them sound similar, so what is the point?

I have often wondered how it would feel writing 1000 articles. If I were to add up all my articles on different sites, I can easily cross the 850 mark. But I am talking about having 1000 articles on only one site. How about that :woohoo:

Without wanting to dampen your enthusiasm I would say that quantity should never be a priority....I have seen some who have written 2000 + articles consisting of 400-500 words and most of them sound similar, so what is the point?

yes..
More than quantity, I too prefer quality...Afterall total cash money counts.....
I never go below 700 or 800 words every article
It's better to wrote one article of 50-75 cash credits rather than writing 2-3 articles earning 20 each. Also, we need to add key words and meta description everytime wasting a lot of time :S :evil:
I am most comfortable with articles 1000 to 1500 words....
2000+ words articles look like essays, yet I have added a lot ;) :laugh: :laugh:

I have often wondered how it would feel writing 1000 articles. If I were to add up all my articles on different sites, I can easily cross the 850 mark. But I am talking about having 1000 articles on only one site. How about that :woohoo:

actually, it's my target for next one year :cheer:
It's possible if you add short articles of rupees 30 or 40. Otherwise very difficult :S

Well, I am not counting articles in terms of only Indian rupees, because I write at some sites where they pay in US dollars too.

I have often wondered how it would feel writing 1000 articles. If I were to add up all my articles on different sites, I can easily cross the 850 mark. But I am talking about having 1000 articles on only one site. How about that :woohoo:

Without wanting to dampen your enthusiasm I would say that quantity should never be a priority....I have seen some who have written 2000 + articles consisting of 400-500 words and most of them sound similar, so what is the point?

@Abhijit- Unlike some other sites where we can respond to as many posters in a row, it's considered spamming on this site. Never mind if some members are doing it but they are doing it at the risk of their post(s) deleted. 2 is acceptable to once in a while but please avoid 3-4 posts in a row. Another friendly one coming from me for you ;)
Note- my first 2 consecutive posts were too harshly criticized 10 month before when I was a new member here. Cheers.

@Abhijit- Unlike some other sites where we can respond to as many posters in a row, it's considered spamming on this site. Never mind if some members are doing it but they are doing it at the risk of their post(s) deleted. 2 is acceptable to once in a while but please avoid 3-4 posts in a row. Another friendly one coming from me for you ;)
Note- my first 2 consecutive posts were too harshly criticized 10 month before when I was a new member here. Cheers.

:S Spamming? I never knew that. If I get 5 replies, I guess, I can write a reply to all 5 people. I didn't get it - "in a row"? I click on "Quote" so that we know whom I am responding to. If I cannot respond immediately, all my answers appear in a row. So what do I do? It may mean, when I feel like responding, can't I respond?

@Abhijit- Unlike some other sites where we can respond to as many posters in a row, it's considered spamming on this site. Never mind if some members are doing it but they are doing it at the risk of their post(s) deleted. 2 is acceptable to once in a while but please avoid 3-4 posts in a row. Another friendly one coming from me for you ;)
Note- my first 2 consecutive posts were too harshly criticized 10 month before when I was a new member here. Cheers.

:S Spamming? I never knew that. If I get 5 replies, I guess, I can write a reply to all 5 people. I didn't get it - "in a row"? I click on "Quote" so that we know whom I am responding to. If I cannot respond immediately, all my answers appear in a row. So what do I do? It may mean, when I feel like responding, can't I respond?

I have often wondered how it would feel writing 1000 articles. If I were to add up all my articles on different sites, I can easily cross the 850 mark. But I am talking about having 1000 articles on only one site. How about that :woohoo:

Without wanting to dampen your enthusiasm I would say that quantity should never be a priority....I have seen some who have written 2000 + articles consisting of 400-500 words and most of them sound similar, so what is the point?

Hey, it's fine. It's not dampening of my spirits. On the contrary, it is like an inspiration to me. I have been writing articles about 350 words on a revenue sharing site. However, when I write on upfront paying sites, I try writing bigger articles.

@Abhijit- Unlike some other sites where we can respond to as many posters in a row, it's considered spamming on this site. Never mind if some members are doing it but they are doing it at the risk of their post(s) deleted. 2 is acceptable to once in a while but please avoid 3-4 posts in a row. Another friendly one coming from me for you ;)
Note- my first 2 consecutive posts were too harshly criticized 10 month before when I was a new member here. Cheers.

:S Spamming? I never knew that. If I get 5 replies, I guess, I can write a reply to all 5 people. I didn't get it - "in a row"? I click on "Quote" so that we know whom I am responding to. If I cannot respond immediately, all my answers appear in a row. So what do I do? It may mean, when I feel like responding, can't I respond?

You certainly can but after some one else too has replied but not two in a row unless must.

@Abhijit- Unlike some other sites where we can respond to as many posters in a row, it's considered spamming on this site. Never mind if some members are doing it but they are doing it at the risk of their post(s) deleted. 2 is acceptable to once in a while but please avoid 3-4 posts in a row. Another friendly one coming from me for you ;)
Note- my first 2 consecutive posts were too harshly criticized 10 month before when I was a new member here. Cheers.

:S Spamming? I never knew that. If I get 5 replies, I guess, I can write a reply to all 5 people. I didn't get it - "in a row"? I click on "Quote" so that we know whom I am responding to. If I cannot respond immediately, all my answers appear in a row. So what do I do? It may mean, when I feel like responding, can't I respond?

You certainly can but after some one else too has replied but not two in a row unless must.

Can you please clarify - I couldn't interpret you correctly. Two in a row how? If you respond, so that's one, Mr. A responds: that's 2, someone else also responds, so that's 3. and then I respond which makes it 4. So, should I not respond to such answers.
OR
two in a row means, only my name appearing for 2-3 times to the left of the pane?
Please clarify?