When Catholics and Muslims openly say that family planning is against their religion, what is wrong if Hindu leaders advise Hindus to have more children? I dont see anything wrong with it....In India everything that Hindu does is seen with colored glasses even when it is something that has always been there ! Most Hindu couple after marriage are blessed by elders - 'May your home be blessed with many children and grandchildren'....

In fact, religion is a divisive and obstructing element. Catholics and Muslims oppose artificial means of family planning. Orthodox Hindus also do. Even Mahatma Gandhi was opposed to artificial means of family planning. All religions have similar views.

However what differentiates Ashok Singhal's statement is that he fears Hindus being reduced to minority. Muslims and Christians oppose family planning measures not because of fear of reducing numbers. This day do on purely religious grounds. Mother Teresa would oppose artificial family planning measures even if Christians were the only community.

When Catholics and Muslims openly say that family planning is against their religion, what is wrong if Hindu leaders advise Hindus to have more children? I dont see anything wrong with it....In India everything that Hindu does is seen with colored glasses even when it is something that has always been there ! Most Hindu couple after marriage are blessed by elders - 'May your home be blessed with many children and grandchildren'....

In fact, religion is a divisive and obstructing element. Catholics and Muslims oppose artificial means of family planning. Orthodox Hindus also do. Even Mahatma Gandhi was opposed to artificial means of family planning. All religions have similar views.

However what differentiates Ashok Singhal's statement is that he fears Hindus being reduced to minority. Muslims and Christians oppose family planning measures not because of fear of reducing numbers. This day do on purely religious grounds. Mother Teresa would oppose artificial family planning measures even if Christians were the only community.

Muslims have more children with the intent of increasing their population.In fact there was a time here in Kerala and bordering Krnataka when there was something termed as love jihad :dry: , where a musilm youth befriended and got a girl to mary him after converting her, it is the same in Catholism where a hindu almost all the time gets converted and never the other way round.There was a huge outcry and quite a few couple were caught ...I doubt if Hindus are that desperate, so the only sane thing that Hindu leaders can do is to advise the Hindus to have more children which is not harmful...

When Catholics and Muslims openly say that family planning is against their religion, what is wrong if Hindu leaders advise Hindus to have more children? I dont see anything wrong with it....In India everything that Hindu does is seen with colored glasses even when it is something that has always been there ! Most Hindu couple after marriage are blessed by elders - 'May your home be blessed with many children and grandchildren'....

In fact, religion is a divisive and obstructing element. Catholics and Muslims oppose artificial means of family planning. Orthodox Hindus also do. Even Mahatma Gandhi was opposed to artificial means of family planning. All religions have similar views.

However what differentiates Ashok Singhal's statement is that he fears Hindus being reduced to minority. Muslims and Christians oppose family planning measures not because of fear of reducing numbers. This day do on purely religious grounds. Mother Teresa would oppose artificial family planning measures even if Christians were the only community.

Muslims have more children with the intent of increasing their population.In fact there was a time here in Kerala and bordering Krnataka when there was something termed as love jihad :dry: , where a musilm youth befriended and got a girl to mary him after converting her, it is the same in Catholism where a hindu almost all the time gets converted and never the other way round.There was a huge outcry and quite a few couple were caught ...I doubt if Hindus are that desperate, so the only sane thing that Hindu leaders can do is to advise the Hindus to have more children which is not harmful...

Here also lies difference in methodolgy of increasing population. The Muslims indulge in 'love jehad' and marry Hindu girls. The Christians get conversion of Hindus to Christianity. This has no affect on overall population increase. Singhal seeks neither Love Jehad nor conversion to Hindusism. He just wants to have Hindus more children. I wonder whether Christians would convert these 'more Hindu children' to christianity or Muslims would marry the 'more Hindu girls' by Love Jehad.
Personally, I am not bothered about proportion of any community in the society. This is not so relevant. Here I may state that 'Parsi community' is fast reducing in number and may disppear soon. This is definitely not relevant. However I am amused on the methods of increasing population of various communities.

When Catholics and Muslims openly say that family planning is against their religion, what is wrong if Hindu leaders advise Hindus to have more children? I dont see anything wrong with it....In India everything that Hindu does is seen with colored glasses even when it is something that has always been there ! Most Hindu couple after marriage are blessed by elders - 'May your home be blessed with many children and grandchildren'....

In fact, religion is a divisive and obstructing element. Catholics and Muslims oppose artificial means of family planning. Orthodox Hindus also do. Even Mahatma Gandhi was opposed to artificial means of family planning. All religions have similar views.

However what differentiates Ashok Singhal's statement is that he fears Hindus being reduced to minority. Muslims and Christians oppose family planning measures not because of fear of reducing numbers. This day do on purely religious grounds. Mother Teresa would oppose artificial family planning measures even if Christians were the only community.

Muslims have more children with the intent of increasing their population.In fact there was a time here in Kerala and bordering Krnataka when there was something termed as love jihad :dry: , where a musilm youth befriended and got a girl to mary him after converting her, it is the same in Catholism where a hindu almost all the time gets converted and never the other way round.There was a huge outcry and quite a few couple were caught ...I doubt if Hindus are that desperate, so the only sane thing that Hindu leaders can do is to advise the Hindus to have more children which is not harmful...

Here also lies difference in methodolgy of increasing population. The Muslims indulge in 'love jehad' and marry Hindu girls. The Christians get conversion of Hindus to Christianity. This has no affect on overall population increase. Singhal seeks neither Love Jehad nor conversion to Hindusism. He just wants to have Hindus more children. I wonder whether Christians would convert these 'more Hindu children' to christianity or Muslims would marry the 'more Hindu girls' by Love Jehad.
Personally, I am not bothered about proportion of any community in the society. This is not so relevant. Here I may state that 'Parsi community' is fast reducing in number and may disppear soon. This is definitely not relevant. However I am amused on the methods of increasing population of various communities.

Surprised to see all communities are indulging these type of method, then why not Hindus, if this is the way to increase population then this should be.

When Catholics and Muslims openly say that family planning is against their religion, what is wrong if Hindu leaders advise Hindus to have more children? I dont see anything wrong with it....In India everything that Hindu does is seen with colored glasses even when it is something that has always been there ! Most Hindu couple after marriage are blessed by elders - 'May your home be blessed with many children and grandchildren'....

In fact, religion is a divisive and obstructing element. Catholics and Muslims oppose artificial means of family planning. Orthodox Hindus also do. Even Mahatma Gandhi was opposed to artificial means of family planning. All religions have similar views.

However what differentiates Ashok Singhal's statement is that he fears Hindus being reduced to minority. Muslims and Christians oppose family planning measures not because of fear of reducing numbers. This day do on purely religious grounds. Mother Teresa would oppose artificial family planning measures even if Christians were the only community.

Muslims have more children with the intent of increasing their population.In fact there was a time here in Kerala and bordering Krnataka when there was something termed as love jihad :dry: , where a musilm youth befriended and got a girl to mary him after converting her, it is the same in Catholism where a hindu almost all the time gets converted and never the other way round.There was a huge outcry and quite a few couple were caught ...I doubt if Hindus are that desperate, so the only sane thing that Hindu leaders can do is to advise the Hindus to have more children which is not harmful...

Here also lies difference in methodolgy of increasing population. The Muslims indulge in 'love jehad' and marry Hindu girls. The Christians get conversion of Hindus to Christianity. This has no affect on overall population increase. Singhal seeks neither Love Jehad nor conversion to Hindusism. He just wants to have Hindus more children. I wonder whether Christians would convert these 'more Hindu children' to christianity or Muslims would marry the 'more Hindu girls' by Love Jehad.
Personally, I am not bothered about proportion of any community in the society. This is not so relevant. Here I may state that 'Parsi community' is fast reducing in number and may disppear soon. This is definitely not relevant. However I am amused on the methods of increasing population of various communities.

Surprised to see all communities are indulging these type of method, then why not Hindus, if this is the way to increase population then this should be.

But only fools are adopting such tactics. The educated and conscious citizens- Hindus, Muslims or christians- are not following any such tactics. Hence, it is necessary to impart education to all and ensure economic growth. The well employed and ambitious persons of any community would prefer better living standard rather than more children. The people below poverty line- Hindus, Muslims or Christians- would have more children. Hence we need to implement schemes of education and job for all.

When Catholics and Muslims openly say that family planning is against their religion, what is wrong if Hindu leaders advise Hindus to have more children? I dont see anything wrong with it....In India everything that Hindu does is seen with colored glasses even when it is something that has always been there ! Most Hindu couple after marriage are blessed by elders - 'May your home be blessed with many children and grandchildren'....

In fact, religion is a divisive and obstructing element. Catholics and Muslims oppose artificial means of family planning. Orthodox Hindus also do. Even Mahatma Gandhi was opposed to artificial means of family planning. All religions have similar views.

However what differentiates Ashok Singhal's statement is that he fears Hindus being reduced to minority. Muslims and Christians oppose family planning measures not because of fear of reducing numbers. This day do on purely religious grounds. Mother Teresa would oppose artificial family planning measures even if Christians were the only community.

Muslims have more children with the intent of increasing their population.In fact there was a time here in Kerala and bordering Krnataka when there was something termed as love jihad :dry: , where a musilm youth befriended and got a girl to mary him after converting her, it is the same in Catholism where a hindu almost all the time gets converted and never the other way round.There was a huge outcry and quite a few couple were caught ...I doubt if Hindus are that desperate, so the only sane thing that Hindu leaders can do is to advise the Hindus to have more children which is not harmful...

Here also lies difference in methodolgy of increasing population. The Muslims indulge in 'love jehad' and marry Hindu girls. The Christians get conversion of Hindus to Christianity. This has no affect on overall population increase. Singhal seeks neither Love Jehad nor conversion to Hindusism. He just wants to have Hindus more children. I wonder whether Christians would convert these 'more Hindu children' to christianity or Muslims would marry the 'more Hindu girls' by Love Jehad.
Personally, I am not bothered about proportion of any community in the society. This is not so relevant. Here I may state that 'Parsi community' is fast reducing in number and may disppear soon. This is definitely not relevant. However I am amused on the methods of increasing population of various communities.

Surprised to see all communities are indulging these type of method, then why not Hindus, if this is the way to increase population then this should be.

But only fools are adopting such tactics. The educated and conscious citizens- Hindus, Muslims or christians- are not following any such tactics. Hence, it is necessary to impart education to all and ensure economic growth. The well employed and ambitious persons of any community would prefer better living standard rather than more children. The people below poverty line- Hindus, Muslims or Christians- would have more children. Hence we need to implement schemes of education and job for all.

In India there is no common civil code for all religions and this is dividing country in terms of religions.

When Catholics and Muslims openly say that family planning is against their religion, what is wrong if Hindu leaders advise Hindus to have more children? I dont see anything wrong with it....In India everything that Hindu does is seen with colored glasses even when it is something that has always been there ! Most Hindu couple after marriage are blessed by elders - 'May your home be blessed with many children and grandchildren'....

In fact, religion is a divisive and obstructing element. Catholics and Muslims oppose artificial means of family planning. Orthodox Hindus also do. Even Mahatma Gandhi was opposed to artificial means of family planning. All religions have similar views.

However what differentiates Ashok Singhal's statement is that he fears Hindus being reduced to minority. Muslims and Christians oppose family planning measures not because of fear of reducing numbers. This day do on purely religious grounds. Mother Teresa would oppose artificial family planning measures even if Christians were the only community.

Muslims have more children with the intent of increasing their population.In fact there was a time here in Kerala and bordering Krnataka when there was something termed as love jihad :dry: , where a musilm youth befriended and got a girl to mary him after converting her, it is the same in Catholism where a hindu almost all the time gets converted and never the other way round.There was a huge outcry and quite a few couple were caught ...I doubt if Hindus are that desperate, so the only sane thing that Hindu leaders can do is to advise the Hindus to have more children which is not harmful...

Here also lies difference in methodolgy of increasing population. The Muslims indulge in 'love jehad' and marry Hindu girls. The Christians get conversion of Hindus to Christianity. This has no affect on overall population increase. Singhal seeks neither Love Jehad nor conversion to Hindusism. He just wants to have Hindus more children. I wonder whether Christians would convert these 'more Hindu children' to christianity or Muslims would marry the 'more Hindu girls' by Love Jehad.
Personally, I am not bothered about proportion of any community in the society. This is not so relevant. Here I may state that 'Parsi community' is fast reducing in number and may disppear soon. This is definitely not relevant. However I am amused on the methods of increasing population of various communities.

Surprised to see all communities are indulging these type of method, then why not Hindus, if this is the way to increase population then this should be.

But only fools are adopting such tactics. The educated and conscious citizens- Hindus, Muslims or christians- are not following any such tactics. Hence, it is necessary to impart education to all and ensure economic growth. The well employed and ambitious persons of any community would prefer better living standard rather than more children. The people below poverty line- Hindus, Muslims or Christians- would have more children. Hence we need to implement schemes of education and job for all.

In India there is no common civil code for all religions and this is dividing country in terms of religions.

The criminal and civil law for all is same in India. The personal law for different communities is for family affairs, marriage, divorce, inheritance of property etc. Hindus, Muslims, Christians all have seperate law only for such matters. What does 'common civil code' mean? The votaries of 'common civil code' are the Hindu communal elements who simply want to thrust the Hindu personal law on non Hindus. This is definitely not acceptable. communities are nothing but extended family and so they can have different rules to manage their affairs on inhgeritance or marriage etc.

When Catholics and Muslims openly say that family planning is against their religion, what is wrong if Hindu leaders advise Hindus to have more children? I dont see anything wrong with it....In India everything that Hindu does is seen with colored glasses even when it is something that has always been there ! Most Hindu couple after marriage are blessed by elders - 'May your home be blessed with many children and grandchildren'....

In fact, religion is a divisive and obstructing element. Catholics and Muslims oppose artificial means of family planning. Orthodox Hindus also do. Even Mahatma Gandhi was opposed to artificial means of family planning. All religions have similar views.

However what differentiates Ashok Singhal's statement is that he fears Hindus being reduced to minority. Muslims and Christians oppose family planning measures not because of fear of reducing numbers. This day do on purely religious grounds. Mother Teresa would oppose artificial family planning measures even if Christians were the only community.

When Catholics and Muslims openly say that family planning is against their religion, what is wrong if Hindu leaders advise Hindus to have more children? I dont see anything wrong with it....In India everything that Hindu does is seen with colored glasses even when it is something that has always been there ! Most Hindu couple after marriage are blessed by elders - 'May your home be blessed with many children and grandchildren'....

In fact, religion is a divisive and obstructing element. Catholics and Muslims oppose artificial means of family planning. Orthodox Hindus also do. Even Mahatma Gandhi was opposed to artificial means of family planning. All religions have similar views.

However what differentiates Ashok Singhal's statement is that he fears Hindus being reduced to minority. Muslims and Christians oppose family planning measures not because of fear of reducing numbers. This day do on purely religious grounds. Mother Teresa would oppose artificial family planning measures even if Christians were the only community.

No Islam does not stop them from family planning as people in developed Muslim countries are adapting to these methods but Muslims in soft countries such as India in order to capture the reins of the country are trying their best to out number Hindus and they have done it successfully with the help of power-hungry politicians to a great extent.