Does any of you know the meaning of what is written in the below mentioned statement?
Khabardar sahiban nazren neechee - Jille Elahi, Shan-e-Hind, Azeem-O-Shaan- Shahenshahon ke Shahenshah Jalaluddin Mohammed Akbar Darbar me Tashreef la rahe hain!
The above bold lettered title was not conferred on Akbar by the historians but his own servants and courtiers so he was bound to be great. Now decide for yourself the chobdars who used to announce Akbars' arrival in the court were really able to see in the future who knew at that time itself that he will become GREAT one day.
Besides we were never short of traitors (we still are not) especially Hindus who would do anything in their self interest to support them for self gain or to show their secularism which has left this country in the stage that it is in today.
I love this free image hosting site for sharing my work
''Which has left this country in the stage that it is in today''. I couldn't get it. It's written in history books that Akbar never differentiate Hindus being a mughal. He treated Hinduism equally. I would call him great because I never heard any Muslim king doing the same.
''Which has left this country in the stage that it is in today''. I couldn't get it. It's written in history books that Akbar never differentiate Hindus being a mughal. He treated Hinduism equally. I would call him great because I never heard any Muslim king doing the same.
Just because an invader treated you cleverly he became GREAT- really great philosophy!
I love this free image hosting site for sharing my work
''Which has left this country in the stage that it is in today''. I couldn't get it. It's written in history books that Akbar never differentiate Hindus being a mughal. He treated Hinduism equally. I would call him great because I never heard any Muslim king doing the same.
Just because an invader treated you cleverly he became GREAT- really great philosophy!
He would have made all Hindus Muslim like aurengzeb tried to do in his dynasty but he did not. Don't you think he could have done it forcibly.;-)
''Which has left this country in the stage that it is in today''. I couldn't get it. It's written in history books that Akbar never differentiate Hindus being a mughal. He treated Hinduism equally. I would call him great because I never heard any Muslim king doing the same.
Just because an invader treated you cleverly he became GREAT- really great philosophy!
He would have made all Hindus Muslim like aurengzeb tried to do in his dynasty but he did not. Don't you think he could have done it forcibly.;-)
No he could not, that's where people like Maharana Pratap and Sikh Gurus were played their role. He had to play carefully which he did and you thought he was a great humanitarian. He was a clever king that's all.
I love this free image hosting site for sharing my work
''Which has left this country in the stage that it is in today''. I couldn't get it. It's written in history books that Akbar never differentiate Hindus being a mughal. He treated Hinduism equally. I would call him great because I never heard any Muslim king doing the same.
Just because an invader treated you cleverly he became GREAT- really great philosophy!
He would have made all Hindus Muslim like aurengzeb tried to do in his dynasty but he did not. Don't you think he could have done it forcibly.;-)
No he could not, that's where people like Maharana Pratap and Sikh Gurus were played their role. He had to play carefully which he did and you thought he was a great humanitarian. He was a clever king that's all.
"He would have made all Hindus into Muslims." is a speculation and presumption . History sees the final product. It doesn't have a place for speculations and unfounded fears.
Who says this is speculation Aurangzeb tried it but couldn't succeed. Akbar never thought of this that's the reason he allowed her wife jodha to have a temple in his Mahal.
Akbar's title of "the great' is now contested as many feel he was not so great. In fact he carried out massacre of a lot of hindus and in addition there is an incident when he wished to take his friends for an outing to see the spectacle of Sati. Not a sign of greatness. even his abolition of Jizzia was more on paper than reality. in fact he had banned it thrice and no result.
Who gave the title to Akbar ' the Great" . how many are aware ? The title came to be used only in thirties and became full blown after 1947 as per the education policy of Congress. Many European and American historians like Will Durant have classified Akbar only a let less sanguine than other Mughals.
