That's something worth appreciating in a world of fashion. I don't see anything wrong in that as well-dressed people indeed look attractive and handsome. Morever, it is easier to work when the dressing is proper as it doesn't interfere in the movements.

That's something worth appreciating in a world of fashion. I don't see anything wrong in that as well-dressed people indeed look attractive and handsome. Morever, it is easier to work when the dressing is proper as it doesn't interfere in the movements.

Of course there are two sides to an issue - one can have a uniform or a dress code which as yoi say brings in discipline in work places...I am all for it since there will not be another reason to get distracted.As t is very less work gets done in government offices so we will have to wait and see if it is going to increase efficinecy or is it just moral policing ...

A general ban on a dress and dress code or uniform at work place differ. A public office must maintain decorum. Jeans and sports shoes and some other items are casual dress not suiting an office. But I don't understand why Dhoti Kurta for gents is not an approved dress in office.

A general ban on a dress and dress code or uniform at work place differ. A public office must maintain decorum. Jeans and sports shoes and some other items are casual dress not suiting an office. But I don't understand why Dhoti Kurta for gents is not an approved dress in office.

A general ban on a dress and dress code or uniform at work place differ. A public office must maintain decorum. Jeans and sports shoes and some other items are casual dress not suiting an office. But I don't understand why Dhoti Kurta for gents is not an approved dress in office.

Dhoti and Kurta is the most comfortable wear, sometimes, it is nice to revert back to past and implement in life styles, it is always appreciated.

That's something worth appreciating in a world of fashion. I don't see anything wrong in that as well-dressed people indeed look attractive and handsome. Morever, it is easier to work when the dressing is proper as it doesn't interfere in the movements.

Of course there are two sides to an issue - one can have a uniform or a dress code which as yoi say brings in discipline in work places...I am all for it since there will not be another reason to get distracted.As t is very less work gets done in government offices so we will have to wait and see if it is going to increase efficinecy or is it just moral policing ...

That's right. Only time will tell if the efficiency increases or not. But I am sure it will at least increase the moral value. I think, a little bit of purpose will be solved.

A general ban on a dress and dress code or uniform at work place differ. A public office must maintain decorum. Jeans and sports shoes and some other items are casual dress not suiting an office. But I don't understand why Dhoti Kurta for gents is not an approved dress in office.

A general ban on a dress and dress code or uniform at work place differ. A public office must maintain decorum. Jeans and sports shoes and some other items are casual dress not suiting an office. But I don't understand why Dhoti Kurta for gents is not an approved dress in office.

Men can wear what they like because they have nothing to expose therefore no dress code for them. Besides, as I said earlier also one needs to hide their wealth, men have nothing to be stolen off. :laugh: :laugh:

On a serious note, they can have a dress code for every one to make it look sober and uniform.[/quote

Men also cannot go to work place in birthday suit or underwear only. I agree that there should be dress code.