Ex Chief of Army staff is now Anna team member. He suggests that parliament be dissolved and new elections held. Is this in national or peoples' interest? Will this solve any problem or just add to public expenditure and thereby inflation?

http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Mumbai/Parliament-should-be-dissolved-immediately-demands-VK-Singh/Article1-951813.aspx

I saw the entire press conference today and some of it made sense and some of it dint, but all said and done the UPA government has lost all credibility as of now ...with tainted ministers upheld and corruption and power play becoming more important than other issues....I doubt if they will be able to pull through the whole term!

The UPA government may continue for full term or shorter term. But if the government falls and elections held, what purpose will be served. Secondly, in order to remove the UPA government and hold elections, you need to defeat ruling alliance by way of no confidence motion or vote on a financial bill. The government cannot be made to quit and hold new election just because ex chief of army staff- now a member of lawless anarchic group- demands so.

I have read that UPA is busy in preparing for the forth coming election which will held in 2014 and not 2013. I don't think that Parliament would dissolve and call for re-election before time. However cabinet has been re-shuffled. This indicates that presently government will not fall.

Reelection is not at all a solution. Any party can rule the country. I always support a complete period of 5 years to any ruling party to avoid unnecessary expenses and loss of time, that can be wisely used for many other purposes.

The proposal for immediate election by dissolving parliament is another proof that team anna is only anarchist and has nothing to do with anti corruption. They know well that even if elections are held every six months, there will be no difference in government functioning. But that will create conditions for anarchy and disorder that is purpose of foreign sponsors and financiers of these so called civil society groups.