I have no so far got the idea behind suggestion to reduce the time for updating the leader board. Clicking of articles and gaining points thereby has nothing to do with leader board. Timing of updating cannot affect the points on reading articles.

Is it not better to concentrate on own work rather than bothering how others gain points. Most of the points are computer generated. This includes article reading, forum posts, polls etc. The system takes care of spam if any. If there is any problem regarding points, the system needs be changed and display of results is not relevant to this.

Last week Mary is really Disgusting as she made 3000 k points by reply only 40 forum many times she only open a articles......I think it should be updated immediately........

You see- every one has his posts and points written on his profile. Just check every one and decide for yourself.

I have noticed that some new members get more points initially by recklessly earning points on articles. They do not read. When they have clicked all articles, they have no way but to vanish. In fact, they are a pitiable lot. I do not envy them.

I agree with you, there are only about 15-20k articles which they can click just once. This many points cannot take them to a payout so there is no use warning them again and again. They should not be paid their share money if admin is sure they used the unfair means. That would be a better action in this case. Banning won't help as they come back and make more ridiculous acts.

Even i also agree with this by mere clicking on articles they can't reach near payout for getting paid they would have to particpate in the forums so let them do it.Once their quota of clicking artciles is over they will certainly find it difficult to earn points. :)

The system permits one point just on clicking an article. If some one uses this provision, he cannot be faulted with. If this is disgusting enough and intolerable, there should be a change in system and not arbitrary action. As i suggested in some other thread, minimum time lag of fifteen minutes or more should be provided between any two clicks for getting a point. This will ensure only one point in fifteen minutes. Here I may also mention that many articles have no material to read and apparently, there is more spam in writing these articles than reading these.

I agree totally with this. There should be a certain time lag between clicking articles for getting points, I will put it to maverick. Also, regarding the quality of articles, there is always going to be differences in standards of articles being accepted. While I accept only those articles that are good quality, I find that others are accepting articles with very obvious and horrible errors. Nothing much I can do about it!

I have noticed. Only old articles are having less content, posted 2 years before, not the articles of present times. Editors now are really doing a nice job :) :) :)

Last week Mary is really Disgusting as she made 3000 k points by reply only 40 forum many times she only open a articles......I think it should be updated immediately........

You see- every one has his posts and points written on his profile. Just check every one and decide for yourself.

I have noticed that some new members get more points initially by recklessly earning points on articles. They do not read. When they have clicked all articles, they have no way but to vanish. In fact, they are a pitiable lot. I do not envy them.

I agree with you, there are only about 15-20k articles which they can click just once. This many points cannot take them to a payout so there is no use warning them again and again. They should not be paid their share money if admin is sure they used the unfair means. That would be a better action in this case. Banning won't help as they come back and make more ridiculous acts.

Even i also agree with this by mere clicking on articles they can't reach near payout for getting paid they would have to particpate in the forums so let them do it.Once their quota of clicking artciles is over they will certainly find it difficult to earn points. :)

The system permits one point just on clicking an article. If some one uses this provision, he cannot be faulted with. If this is disgusting enough and intolerable, there should be a change in system and not arbitrary action. As i suggested in some other thread, minimum time lag of fifteen minutes or more should be provided between any two clicks for getting a point. This will ensure only one point in fifteen minutes. Here I may also mention that many articles have no material to read and apparently, there is more spam in writing these articles than reading these.

I agree totally with this. There should be a certain time lag between clicking articles for getting points, I will put it to maverick. Also, regarding the quality of articles, there is always going to be differences in standards of articles being accepted. While I accept only those articles that are good quality, I find that others are accepting articles with very obvious and horrible errors. Nothing much I can do about it!

I have noticed. Only old articles are having less content, posted 2 years before, not the articles of present times. Editors now are really doing a nice job :) :) :)

Yes they have increased their requirement now.I have tried to submit articles with less content but now they reject them saying that article has less content few of mine were rejected in the starting. :blink:

Last week Mary is really Disgusting as she made 3000 k points by reply only 40 forum many times she only open a articles......I think it should be updated immediately........

You see- every one has his posts and points written on his profile. Just check every one and decide for yourself.

I have noticed that some new members get more points initially by recklessly earning points on articles. They do not read. When they have clicked all articles, they have no way but to vanish. In fact, they are a pitiable lot. I do not envy them.

I agree with you, there are only about 15-20k articles which they can click just once. This many points cannot take them to a payout so there is no use warning them again and again. They should not be paid their share money if admin is sure they used the unfair means. That would be a better action in this case. Banning won't help as they come back and make more ridiculous acts.

Even i also agree with this by mere clicking on articles they can't reach near payout for getting paid they would have to particpate in the forums so let them do it.Once their quota of clicking artciles is over they will certainly find it difficult to earn points. :)

The system permits one point just on clicking an article. If some one uses this provision, he cannot be faulted with. If this is disgusting enough and intolerable, there should be a change in system and not arbitrary action. As i suggested in some other thread, minimum time lag of fifteen minutes or more should be provided between any two clicks for getting a point. This will ensure only one point in fifteen minutes. Here I may also mention that many articles have no material to read and apparently, there is more spam in writing these articles than reading these.

Last week Mary is really Disgusting as she made 3000 k points by reply only 40 forum many times she only open a articles......I think it should be updated immediately........

You see- every one has his posts and points written on his profile. Just check every one and decide for yourself.

I have noticed that some new members get more points initially by recklessly earning points on articles. They do not read. When they have clicked all articles, they have no way but to vanish. In fact, they are a pitiable lot. I do not envy them.

I agree with you, there are only about 15-20k articles which they can click just once. This many points cannot take them to a payout so there is no use warning them again and again. They should not be paid their share money if admin is sure they used the unfair means. That would be a better action in this case. Banning won't help as they come back and make more ridiculous acts.

Even i also agree with this by mere clicking on articles they can't reach near payout for getting paid they would have to particpate in the forums so let them do it.Once their quota of clicking artciles is over they will certainly find it difficult to earn points. :)

The system permits one point just on clicking an article. If some one uses this provision, he cannot be faulted with. If this is disgusting enough and intolerable, there should be a change in system and not arbitrary action. As i suggested in some other thread, minimum time lag of fifteen minutes or more should be provided between any two clicks for getting a point. This will ensure only one point in fifteen minutes. Here I may also mention that many articles have no material to read and apparently, there is more spam in writing these articles than reading these.

I agree totally with this. There should be a certain time lag between clicking articles for getting points, I will put it to maverick. Also, regarding the quality of articles, there is always going to be differences in standards of articles being accepted. While I accept only those articles that are good quality, I find that others are accepting articles with very obvious and horrible errors. Nothing much I can do about it!

I have noticed. Only old articles are having less content, posted 2 years before, not the articles of present times. Editors now are really doing a nice job :) :) :)

Yes they have increased their requirement now.I have tried to submit articles with less content but now they reject them saying that article has less content few of mine were rejected in the starting. :blink:

Yes..it's really irritating to open an article seeing its title and see full gas inside it :woohoo: :angry:

Last week Mary is really Disgusting as she made 3000 k points by reply only 40 forum many times she only open a articles......I think it should be updated immediately........

You see- every one has his posts and points written on his profile. Just check every one and decide for yourself.

I have noticed that some new members get more points initially by recklessly earning points on articles. They do not read. When they have clicked all articles, they have no way but to vanish. In fact, they are a pitiable lot. I do not envy them.

I agree with you, there are only about 15-20k articles which they can click just once. This many points cannot take them to a payout so there is no use warning them again and again. They should not be paid their share money if admin is sure they used the unfair means. That would be a better action in this case. Banning won't help as they come back and make more ridiculous acts.

Even i also agree with this by mere clicking on articles they can't reach near payout for getting paid they would have to particpate in the forums so let them do it.Once their quota of clicking artciles is over they will certainly find it difficult to earn points. :)

The system permits one point just on clicking an article. If some one uses this provision, he cannot be faulted with. If this is disgusting enough and intolerable, there should be a change in system and not arbitrary action. As i suggested in some other thread, minimum time lag of fifteen minutes or more should be provided between any two clicks for getting a point. This will ensure only one point in fifteen minutes. Here I may also mention that many articles have no material to read and apparently, there is more spam in writing these articles than reading these.

I agree totally with this. There should be a certain time lag between clicking articles for getting points, I will put it to maverick. Also, regarding the quality of articles, there is always going to be differences in standards of articles being accepted. While I accept only those articles that are good quality, I find that others are accepting articles with very obvious and horrible errors. Nothing much I can do about it!

I have noticed. Only old articles are having less content, posted 2 years before, not the articles of present times. Editors now are really doing a nice job :) :) :)

Yes they have increased their requirement now.I have tried to submit articles with less content but now they reject them saying that article has less content few of mine were rejected in the starting. :blink:

Yes..it's really irritating to open an article seeing its title and see full gas inside it :woohoo: :angry:

So, someone has to take responsibility for that right ? the writer of the article to some extent and the moderator who passed the article ,to a great extent , what do you say ?

Last week Mary is really Disgusting as she made 3000 k points by reply only 40 forum many times she only open a articles......I think it should be updated immediately........

You see- every one has his posts and points written on his profile. Just check every one and decide for yourself.

I have noticed that some new members get more points initially by recklessly earning points on articles. They do not read. When they have clicked all articles, they have no way but to vanish. In fact, they are a pitiable lot. I do not envy them.

I agree with you, there are only about 15-20k articles which they can click just once. This many points cannot take them to a payout so there is no use warning them again and again. They should not be paid their share money if admin is sure they used the unfair means. That would be a better action in this case. Banning won't help as they come back and make more ridiculous acts.

Even i also agree with this by mere clicking on articles they can't reach near payout for getting paid they would have to particpate in the forums so let them do it.Once their quota of clicking artciles is over they will certainly find it difficult to earn points. :)

The system permits one point just on clicking an article. If some one uses this provision, he cannot be faulted with. If this is disgusting enough and intolerable, there should be a change in system and not arbitrary action. As i suggested in some other thread, minimum time lag of fifteen minutes or more should be provided between any two clicks for getting a point. This will ensure only one point in fifteen minutes. Here I may also mention that many articles have no material to read and apparently, there is more spam in writing these articles than reading these.

I agree totally with this. There should be a certain time lag between clicking articles for getting points, I will put it to maverick. Also, regarding the quality of articles, there is always going to be differences in standards of articles being accepted. While I accept only those articles that are good quality, I find that others are accepting articles with very obvious and horrible errors. Nothing much I can do about it!

I have noticed. Only old articles are having less content, posted 2 years before, not the articles of present times. Editors now are really doing a nice job :) :) :)

Yes they have increased their requirement now.I have tried to submit articles with less content but now they reject them saying that article has less content few of mine were rejected in the starting. :blink:

Yes..it's really irritating to open an article seeing its title and see full gas inside it :woohoo: :angry:

So, someone has to take responsibility for that right ? the writer of the article to some extent and the moderator who passed the article ,to a great extent , what do you say ?

Truth is that...when this site was started, no restrictions for word/character length for submitted articles....also total number of articles to be submitted daily. Now, it's not the case. We can't submit any article below 300 words now. That rule has really reduced spamming a lot.
But old articles are not deleted till now and are appearing in scroll bars, from which, attracted by its titles, we often open such less content, useless articles. Isn't it? :P :P

Last week Mary is really Disgusting as she made 3000 k points by reply only 40 forum many times she only open a articles......I think it should be updated immediately........

You see- every one has his posts and points written on his profile. Just check every one and decide for yourself.

I have noticed that some new members get more points initially by recklessly earning points on articles. They do not read. When they have clicked all articles, they have no way but to vanish. In fact, they are a pitiable lot. I do not envy them.

I agree with you, there are only about 15-20k articles which they can click just once. This many points cannot take them to a payout so there is no use warning them again and again. They should not be paid their share money if admin is sure they used the unfair means. That would be a better action in this case. Banning won't help as they come back and make more ridiculous acts.

Even i also agree with this by mere clicking on articles they can't reach near payout for getting paid they would have to particpate in the forums so let them do it.Once their quota of clicking artciles is over they will certainly find it difficult to earn points. :)

The system permits one point just on clicking an article. If some one uses this provision, he cannot be faulted with. If this is disgusting enough and intolerable, there should be a change in system and not arbitrary action. As i suggested in some other thread, minimum time lag of fifteen minutes or more should be provided between any two clicks for getting a point. This will ensure only one point in fifteen minutes. Here I may also mention that many articles have no material to read and apparently, there is more spam in writing these articles than reading these.

I agree totally with this. There should be a certain time lag between clicking articles for getting points, I will put it to maverick. Also, regarding the quality of articles, there is always going to be differences in standards of articles being accepted. While I accept only those articles that are good quality, I find that others are accepting articles with very obvious and horrible errors. Nothing much I can do about it!

I have noticed. Only old articles are having less content, posted 2 years before, not the articles of present times. Editors now are really doing a nice job :) :) :)

Yes they have increased their requirement now.I have tried to submit articles with less content but now they reject them saying that article has less content few of mine were rejected in the starting. :blink:

Yes..it's really irritating to open an article seeing its title and see full gas inside it :woohoo: :angry:

So, someone has to take responsibility for that right ? the writer of the article to some extent and the moderator who passed the article ,to a great extent , what do you say ?

Truth is that...when this site was started, no restrictions for word/character length for submitted articles....also total number of articles to be submitted daily. Now, it's not the case. We can't submit any article below 300 words now. That rule has really reduced spamming a lot.
But old articles are not deleted till now and are appearing in scroll bars, from which, attracted by its titles, we often open such less content, useless articles. Isn't it? :P :P

I don't read much of the articles here but i know minimum 300 words required to write here for article to get approved.Even the cash they give us on the articles depending on the content i have seen long articles get more cash than short articles though quality is desired in both. :blink:

Last week Mary is really Disgusting as she made 3000 k points by reply only 40 forum many times she only open a articles......I think it should be updated immediately........

You see- every one has his posts and points written on his profile. Just check every one and decide for yourself.

I have noticed that some new members get more points initially by recklessly earning points on articles. They do not read. When they have clicked all articles, they have no way but to vanish. In fact, they are a pitiable lot. I do not envy them.

I agree with you, there are only about 15-20k articles which they can click just once. This many points cannot take them to a payout so there is no use warning them again and again. They should not be paid their share money if admin is sure they used the unfair means. That would be a better action in this case. Banning won't help as they come back and make more ridiculous acts.

Even i also agree with this by mere clicking on articles they can't reach near payout for getting paid they would have to particpate in the forums so let them do it.Once their quota of clicking artciles is over they will certainly find it difficult to earn points. :)

The system permits one point just on clicking an article. If some one uses this provision, he cannot be faulted with. If this is disgusting enough and intolerable, there should be a change in system and not arbitrary action. As i suggested in some other thread, minimum time lag of fifteen minutes or more should be provided between any two clicks for getting a point. This will ensure only one point in fifteen minutes. Here I may also mention that many articles have no material to read and apparently, there is more spam in writing these articles than reading these.

I agree totally with this. There should be a certain time lag between clicking articles for getting points, I will put it to maverick. Also, regarding the quality of articles, there is always going to be differences in standards of articles being accepted. While I accept only those articles that are good quality, I find that others are accepting articles with very obvious and horrible errors. Nothing much I can do about it!

I have noticed. Only old articles are having less content, posted 2 years before, not the articles of present times. Editors now are really doing a nice job :) :) :)

Yes they have increased their requirement now.I have tried to submit articles with less content but now they reject them saying that article has less content few of mine were rejected in the starting. :blink:

Yes..it's really irritating to open an article seeing its title and see full gas inside it :woohoo: :angry:

So, someone has to take responsibility for that right ? the writer of the article to some extent and the moderator who passed the article ,to a great extent , what do you say ?

Truth is that...when this site was started, no restrictions for word/character length for submitted articles....also total number of articles to be submitted daily. Now, it's not the case. We can't submit any article below 300 words now. That rule has really reduced spamming a lot.
But old articles are not deleted till now and are appearing in scroll bars, from which, attracted by its titles, we often open such less content, useless articles. Isn't it? :P :P

I don't read much of the articles here but i know minimum 300 words required to write here for article to get approved.Even the cash they give us on the articles depending on the content i have seen long articles get more cash than short articles though quality is desired in both. :blink:

yes. Here no. of words count more than its quality.
Write an article about 2500-3000 words. It's sure, you will get 85 or more rupees cash credits...irrespective of its contents. Also, never forget to add some nice pictures :P