Like it on Facebook, Tweet it or share this topic on other bookmarking websites.

Members should practice civilty in discussion..If a member points out from hstory the defeat of Hindus as a analogy, there is no need to take offence. This is a fact. Sadly so many armchair specialists are in this discussion who feel what they say is gospel truth.

Thank you said by: rambabu

A point that so called champions of 'truth' fail to realize that a nation is not built on tolerance. In Pakistan a young man has been sentenced to 10 years in jail for flying the Indian flag. ( he was a fan of Kohli).   Nation cannot be built on tolerance. This earlier caused the defeat of Hindus. All the culprits need to be arrested and sent to jail. I would advocate flogging like in Singapore.  I was in Singapore when an Indian was flogged on orders of court for a trivial offence.

I sincerely feel, in a discussion forum, the question of losing temper by the members is unhealthy. If a member comes up with a convincing response related to the Thread, one has to be broadminded and accept the other member's response.Only undesirable fact is, no member should force  his opinion.

 

rambabu wrote:

I sincerely feel, in a discussion forum, the question of losing temper by the members is unhealthy. If a member comes up with a convincing response related to the Thread, one has to be broadminded and accept the other member's response.Only undesirable fact is, no member should force  his opinion.

Yes Rambabu, you have hit the nail on the head. great comment

 

 

MG Singh wrote:
rambabu wrote:

I sincerely feel, in a discussion forum, the question of losing temper by the members is unhealthy. If a member comes up with a convincing response related to the Thread, one has to be broadminded and accept the other member's response.Only undesirable fact is, no member should force  his opinion.

Yes Rambabu, you have hit the nail on the head. great comment

In this context, I recall an opinion expressed by one of our learned members. His wise words are still ringing in my ears. He said, if some member refuses to accept the other member's opinion, leave it. We need a congenial atmosphere in these discussion forums.

 

 

 

rambabu wrote:
MG Singh wrote:
rambabu wrote:

I sincerely feel, in a discussion forum, the question of losing temper by the members is unhealthy. If a member comes up with a convincing response related to the Thread, one has to be broadminded and accept the other member's response.Only undesirable fact is, no member should force  his opinion.

Yes Rambabu, you have hit the nail on the head. great comment

In this context, I recall an opinion expressed by one of our learned members. His wise words are still ringing in my ears. He said, if some member refuses to accept the other member's opinion, leave it. We need a congenial atmosphere in these discussion forums.

 

 

 

This is a case of the pan calling the kettle black....Rambabu's is a view  typical of a fence sitter shifting his views as things go LOL....so I find it ludicrous that he is lecturing about losing temper , when he himself is insulting and rude to many members ..


Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!

usha manohar wrote:
rambabu wrote:
MG Singh wrote:
rambabu wrote:

I sincerely feel, in a discussion forum, the question of losing temper by the members is unhealthy. If a member comes up with a convincing response related to the Thread, one has to be broadminded and accept the other member's response.Only undesirable fact is, no member should force  his opinion.

Yes Rambabu, you have hit the nail on the head. great comment

In this context, I recall an opinion expressed by one of our learned members. His wise words are still ringing in my ears. He said, if some member refuses to accept the other member's opinion, leave it. We need a congenial atmosphere in these discussion forums.

 

 

 

This is a case of the pan calling the kettle black....Rambabu's is a view  typical of a fence sitter shifting his views as things go LOL....so I find it ludicrous that he is lecturing about losing temper , when he himself is insulting and rude to many members ..

Can you quote a single instance where I insulted and behaved rudely with another member ? This is a baseless allegation.

 

rambabu wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
rambabu wrote:
MG Singh wrote:
rambabu wrote:

I sincerely feel, in a discussion forum, the question of losing temper by the members is unhealthy. If a member comes up with a convincing response related to the Thread, one has to be broadminded and accept the other member's response.Only undesirable fact is, no member should force  his opinion.

Yes Rambabu, you have hit the nail on the head. great comment

In this context, I recall an opinion expressed by one of our learned members. His wise words are still ringing in my ears. He said, if some member refuses to accept the other member's opinion, leave it. We need a congenial atmosphere in these discussion forums.

 

 

 

This is a case of the pan calling the kettle black....Rambabu's is a view  typical of a fence sitter shifting his views as things go LOL....so I find it ludicrous that he is lecturing about losing temper , when he himself is insulting and rude to many members ..

Can you quote a single instance where I insulted and behaved rudely with another member ? This is a baseless allegation.

 

Since you have enough time on hand as told by you time and again , for a starter you could go through your various discussions without any bias ..


Pay no mind to those who talk behind your back, it simply means that you are two steps ahead !!!

usha manohar wrote:
rambabu wrote:
usha manohar wrote:
rambabu wrote:
MG Singh wrote:
rambabu wrote:

I sincerely feel, in a discussion forum, the question of losing temper by the members is unhealthy. If a member comes up with a convincing response related to the Thread, one has to be broadminded and accept the other member's response.Only undesirable fact is, no member should force  his opinion.

Yes Rambabu, you have hit the nail on the head. great comment

In this context, I recall an opinion expressed by one of our learned members. His wise words are still ringing in my ears. He said, if some member refuses to accept the other member's opinion, leave it. We need a congenial atmosphere in these discussion forums.

 

 

 

This is a case of the pan calling the kettle black....Rambabu's is a view  typical of a fence sitter shifting his views as things go LOL....so I find it ludicrous that he is lecturing about losing temper , when he himself is insulting and rude to many members ..

Can you quote a single instance where I insulted and behaved rudely with another member ? This is a baseless allegation.

 

Since you have enough time on hand as told by you time and again , for a starter you could go through your various discussions without any bias ..

Since you alleged about my rude behaviour, it would be appropriate for you to quote about my rude behaviour. Anyhow, this kind of allegations and counter allegations will not lead us anywhere. As a gesture of goodwill and modesty, I withdraw. I don't have anything to add to this discussion.

 

Every one is innocent unless proved. But there is mass frenzy created by the saffron elements. It is said patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. This is amply demonstrated by language and deeds of the saffron hooligans who do not want the legal process to go on but want to settle on street by intimidation and hooliganism.  It is the hooliganism and frenzy created by the saffron goons that is creating all trouble. In normal circumstances, the accused would either surrendered before police/ court and the matter would be decided lawfully. But owing to the frenzy and madness created by saffron elements, the accused don't feel safe to surrender either before police or court.

Moreover this is not a question of treason as such. The larger question is that the saffron gang is creating an impression that whosoever has divergent views is traitor.  They have manipulated videos and other documents by photoshop and other  tricks.

What we need is restoration of normalcy so that the case (if any) be decided judicially. If the police have only fake evidence, as appears, it is best that they withdraw and beg pardon. Otherwise, let the judicial process  begin and come to finality according to due judicial process. Till the issue is resolved  by due process of law, the saffron party should refrain from issuing certificate of patriotism (or treachery). I*t may also not be out of place to mention that large number of Indians- Muslims, Christians, Dalits and even those who do not agree with divisive fascist Hindutva ideology, are outside the concept of 'Nation' ofr the saffron elements. This means that the real anti national are the saffron elements.   


G. K. Ajmani Tax consultant
http://gkajmani-mystraythoughts.blogspot.com/

You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.